On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Niel<spam-f...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > Hi > >> When a translator updates a translation (a file), they write which CVS >> Revision in EN it's synced to. So, later when the EN version is >> updated we then know that the translated is outdated. And all of our >> translation tools rely on the incremental nature of CVS revision >> numbers.
Why is this a problem? SVN revision numbers are incremental as well. I don't see the difference between tying a translation to CVS-123456 and SVN-123456?
