Richard Lowe wrote: > Dan Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Mon 03 Mar 2008 at 06:44PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-resync >>>> >>>> This set of changes resync the repository to build 83a. It includes >>>> some additions to the slim_cluster including new video, networking and >>>> storage drivers. It also removes some earlier workarounds since >>>> compressed lofi(7D) and an official fix for 6332924 came in later >>>> builds. >>> Still looking for a review of the above set of changes... >> Why are servicetags (SUNWservicetag / SUNWstosreg) in slim? >> >> Minimally, these seem pointless for now since AFAIK servicetags aren't >> going to do anything useful until we create an action for them. >> >> Also, I have no idea why we'd need them on the Live CD, so hopefully >> they won't show up there. >> >> In general, -1 to "OS Registration", although that's all above my >> pay grade, surely. > > When I looked it also looked like stosreg defaulted enabled in the > service profiles, though I may have misread that. >
Yes, it is in the standard ones. But all that service does is create the OS tag and put it in a local registry. > Is that really desirable? (the service tags arc cases were not > exposed, so I'm not entirely sure how the various services play > together) > The expectation is that service tags will be an open project soon. Dave _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
