On Dec 30, 2007 7:57 AM, Mirko Vukovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007 12:09 PM, Michael Welle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Mirko Vukovic wrote:
> > >
> > > On Dec 27, 2007 12:55 PM, Michael Welle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > I use unison to sync the planner files on different sites. To prevent
> > > > duplicate task ids (if you use them) start with a different value on
> > > > each site, eg. 1 on the first site, 10000 on the second site etc.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I also use unison. To keep task numbers synced, I also sync the
> > > ~/.planner-tasks (or whatever its name is) file.
> > that necessitates that all sites are synced _before_ you can create a
> > new task.With my approach one can create a task at the first site,
> > some days later one can create a task at the second and at the third
> > site, later one can create a task at the first site again. All that
> > actions can be performed _without_ syncing the files. But if one syncs
> > the files at a point in time all files (and tasks) are in a consistent
> > state.
> >
> > VG
> > hmw
> >
>
> True. I have to sync my files at the beginning and end of every work day.
>
> Mirko
>
I think that this conundrum calls for an option to planner-tasks: to
number the tasks using the machine-name:number convention, like:
{{task:machine-name:task-number}}.
Opinions?
Mirko
_______________________________________________
Planner-el-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
