> I thought you said it was immoral to charge for your software? Are you
> changing your mind? Or is this that new and improved 'selective
> morality' I keep hearing about?
Not at all. You seem to have the only 'selective morality' I've
seen here yet. Shall I quote you some examples?
"We transferred easily over a million dollars worth of stolen
software in the time that I ran it give or take a couple hundred
thousand."
"I even ran a porn site for a length of time and let me tell you
that it was getting increasingly harder and hard to find ANYWHERE
to host porn (as of about 3 or 4 years ago) where you didn't pay
and arm and a leg up front for bandwidth."
"Open source may be a great idea, and I agree with it when its
voluntary. But open source does not mean steal everything in
sight, and that is what bittorrent and napster and so forth are
used for."
The software is free, the distribution on CD to -you-, is not.
You have some choices here:
1.) Use it.
2.) Don't use it.
Without contributing much in terms of help, support, or other
means, complaining that what WE do for FREE, doesn't suit your needs,
falls on deaf ears.
This discussion is pointless, because you do not understand the
base technology behind the protocol, and the reason it was developed, and
why we are using it.
Until you learn enough about that to have a healthy, non-abusive
discussion about the merits of it, my involvement in your replies is over.
d.
_______________________________________________
plucker-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
