Sure I addressed your silly ass post... You CLAIM no one should care why they are unproductive.
As I have SHOWN why they should in fact care. Imagine that. Spin it any other way you like holly, you think I knew you would admit you were wrong? When have you EVER done such a thing here? On Oct 25, 5:48 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gaar, > > Hell they ARE "just sitting" on some. Hell, they will buy "some" for > no other reason than to keep it out of the hands of an existing or > potential competitor just in case it does have oil. > You can "believe" anything you want is "relevant". > You didn't refute a damn word of my post, did you? You just talked > about what you "believed to be relevant". Sheeeet, you can "believe" > in Santa Claus if you wish to and "believe" THAT to be relevant. > > On Oct 25, 7:38 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 25, 5:32 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yep, a oil lease not currectly producing oil IS "unproductive". Who > > > cares why it isn't? > > > I believe it is relevant to people's assertions that the Oil Companies > > are just sitting on these Leases... > > > You obviously think it is ok to falsely portray such things. > > > No surprise there.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
