Perhaps in your simple little mind... But not everything is about you and your simple little mind.
On Oct 25, 9:00 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gaar, > > DISPUTED perhaps but certainly not REFUTED, which was the word I used. > Invest in a dictionary. > > On Oct 25, 8:19 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Addressed and refuted. Idiot. > > > Again, you claim no one cares, and I showed why and that they do/ > > should... > > > Just because relevant information doesn't seem so to you doesn't mean > > everyone is an Idiot, like you. > > > You understand that, right? > > > On Oct 25, 6:14 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > gaar, > > > > I love the way you play with words and their meanings. > > > > Lad, I did not say you failed to ADDRESS my post. I said you failed to > > > REFUTE anything I said in that post. > > > > Your getting sloppy and careless. > > > > On Oct 25, 7:51 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Sure I addressed your silly ass post... > > > > > You CLAIM no one should care why they are unproductive. > > > > > As I have SHOWN why they should in fact care. > > > > > Imagine that. > > > > > Spin it any other way you like holly, you think I knew you would admit > > > > you were wrong? > > > > > When have you EVER done such a thing here? > > > > > On Oct 25, 5:48 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > Hell they ARE "just sitting" on some. Hell, they will buy "some" for > > > > > no other reason than to keep it out of the hands of an existing or > > > > > potential competitor just in case it does have oil. > > > > > You can "believe" anything you want is "relevant". > > > > > You didn't refute a damn word of my post, did you? You just talked > > > > > about what you "believed to be relevant". Sheeeet, you can "believe" > > > > > in Santa Claus if you wish to and "believe" THAT to be relevant. > > > > > > On Oct 25, 7:38 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 25, 5:32 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yep, a oil lease not currectly producing oil IS "unproductive". > > > > > > > Who > > > > > > > cares why it isn't? > > > > > > > I believe it is relevant to people's assertions that the Oil > > > > > > Companies > > > > > > are just sitting on these Leases... > > > > > > > You obviously think it is ok to falsely portray such things. > > > > > > > No surprise there.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
