It is GOVERNMENT that is prohibited (by the Constitution and IDEA underpinning) from discriminating NOT individuals.
Any State or Local Law would ALSO be in conflict/violation of Amendment XIII -- involuntary servitude.
Regard$,
--MJ
March 15, 2014
If I Must Sell, You Must Buy
by Jim Fedako
https://mises.org/daily/6690/If-I-Must-Sell-You-Must-Buy
At 08:11 PM 8/27/2014, you wrote:
You are correct Michael, with the exception of the States that have not added "Gender" or "homosexual" Â discrimination....I am not sure how the federal code applies to these specific "New Classes" Â of folks, Â but I would think that State law would govern. Â I also think that there could in fact be an argument made about ex post facto laws, even in a civil construction of such.....--
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:55 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
- This is ILLEGAL (though not constitutionally so) thanks to much hailed (unconstitutional) CRA of '64 and its whole cloth invention ... public accommodation.
- Furthermore ... it is clearly involuntary servitude (supposedly ended with Amendment XIII).
- Regard$,
- --MJ
- "A right is the sanction of independent action. A right is that which can be exercised without anyone's permission. If you exist only because society permits you to exist, you have no right to your own life. A permission can be revoked at any time. If, before undertaking some action, you must obtain the permission of society -- you are not free, whether such permission is granted to you or not. Only a slave acts on permission. A permission is not a right. -- Alyssa Rosenbaum
- At 07:42 PM 8/27/2014, you wrote:
- I don't see how refusing to perform or provide services in a very open market could even remotely be construed as "Persecution".....
- On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:06 PM, plainolamerican < [email protected]> wrote:
- they're free to practice their religion.
- they are not free to persecute lgbt or muslims.
- On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:05:12 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
- What about these Christian's right to practice their religion freely without prosecution? Â
- On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:49 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote:
- more proof that only religious myth believers persecute gays.
- they were also ordered by the court to put up an anti-discrimination sign on their property.
- On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 4:08:57 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
- Dr. Eowyn posted: "The Gaystapo strikes again. A Christian couple who own a farm in upstate New York are being fined $10,000 for declined a lesbian couple̢۪s request to hold a weddinding ceremony on their property. The owners are also ordered to to pay $1,500 to each lesbian"
- Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on Fellowship of the Minds
Christian farm owners fined $13,000 for declining to host lesbian wedding
- by Dr. Eowyn
- The Gaystapo strikes again.
- A Christian couple who own a farm in upstate New York are being fined $10,000 for declined a lesbian couple̢۪s request to ho hold a wedding ceremony on their property. The owners are also ordered to to pay $1,500 to each lesbian.
- The Washington Post reports, Aug. 19, 2014, that Cynthia and Robert Gifford, who own Liberty Ridge Farm near Albany, rent their facilities for birthday parties and about a dozen weddings each year.
- Cynthia & Robert Gifford
- When Jennifer McCarthy and Melisa Erwin, a lesbian couple from Newark, N.J., requested to use the facility for their 2012 wedding, Cynthia Gifford offered the farm for a reception, but not for the wedding ceremony. Weddings typically are conducted on the first floor of the Giffords̢۪ home or in an adjacent field.
- >
- Jennifer McCarthy (l), Melisa Erwin (r)
- James Trainor, the Giffords' lawyer, said the farm owners attend a community church and cite their religious belief of marriage between a man and woman for declining to hold a same-sex wedding on their property. “Liberty Ridge Farm has employed gay pepeople and has conducted events for same-sex couples,†Trainor said. ⢀œThe Giffords’ objection was to hosting and participatinging in the wedding ceremony itself and not to providing service in general to lesbians.â€
- But administrative law judge Migdalia Pares of the Bronx rejected the Giffords’ argument that the farm, which is also so their home, is not a place of public accommodation and is therefore not subject to the anti-discrimination provisions of New York’s Human Rn Rights Law. Pares ruled that although the Giffords reside at Gifford Barn, Liberty Ridge qualifies as a public accommodation because it regularly collects fees for space, facilities, services and meals, so it cannot be considered “distinctly private.â€
- r>
- The Giffords must pay $13,000 in fines and restitution. Their lawyer says they are considering whether to appeal or pursue further legal action.
- The now-married lesbians filed a complaint with New York’s Division n of Human Rights, and the administrative law judge said that Liberty Ridge “unlawfully discriminated against complainants solely o on the basis of their sexual orientation.â€
- Earlier this year, several states, including Kansas and Arizona, considered legislation that would allow people who object to same-sex marriage to cite their religious beliefs as a defense if faced with a discrimination lawsuit. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed the bill in her state; the Kansas bill died in the state Senate.
- See also:
- Christian bridal shop under fire after refusing to help lesbian couple find dresses
- Colorado Judge compels baker to sell wedding cake to homosexuals
- Gaystapo strikes again: Chase Bank asks employees to declare loyalty to LGBT
- Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich Resigns After Backlash Over Support For Prop 8 Same-Sex Marriage Ban
- World Health Organization: HIV ‘explodingââ‚€™ among homosexual men
- ~Eowyn
- Dr. Eowyn | August 26, 2014 at 1:17 pm | Tags: Cynthia Gifford, Jennifer McCarthy, Liberty Ridge Farm, Melisa Erwin, Migdalia Pares, Robert Gifford | Categories: Christians/Christianity, Culture War, Gays, Liberals/Democrats/Left, Obama's America, persecution of Christians | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-rFT
- Comment    See all comments
- Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
- Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
- Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
- http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/08/26/christian-farm-owners-fined-13000-for-declining-to-host-lesbian-wedding/
- Thanks for flying with WordPress.com
- --
- --
- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- Â
- * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- ---
- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
- For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
- --
- --
- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- Â
- * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- ---
- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
- For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
- --
- --
- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- Â
- * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- ---
- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
- For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
- --
- --
- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- Â
- * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- ---
- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
- For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
