Susan Rice --- a silver spoon fed warmongering zionist to ignore. On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:47:51 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > <http://allenbwest.com/> > incompetent or just REALLY blatantly incompetent? > > Written by Allen West <http://allenbwest.com/author/allen/> on October > 13, 2014 > > [image: rice] > > So I just have to wonder, will the Obama administration ever learn it’s a > bad idea to wheel out Susan Rice on a Sunday talk show? The former U.S. > Ambassador to the UN will always be remembered for her five Sunday talk > show appearances where she claimed the Benghazi attack was a “spontaneous > reaction to a crude anti-Islam video” and she was on because former > Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “too tired” to appear. > > Rice later appeared as National Security Advisor on Meet The Press and > continued to staunchly defend her original statement about the anti-Islam > video — which we now know was a lie. She said, “That information turned > out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct. But the notion that > somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people > is patently false. And I think that that’s been amply demonstrated.” > > Riiiight. > > So if there’s ANYONE you’d think Obama wouldn’t want speaking on a Sunday > talk show it would be Susan Rice — but then hey, he probably had no clue. > After all, he’s only been to 42.1 percent of his intel briefings. And I > guess Obama is “too tired” from all those fundraisers. > > Susan Rice: Fight Against ISIS A... > > Inform > > Nonetheless, yesterday Rice — the National Security Advisor — further > advanced the idea that she is either blatantly incompetent or just REALLY > blatantly incompetent. > > As reported by the Washington Free Beacon > <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/rice-defends-us-islamic-state-strategy/>, > > “On Sunday, Rice said the United States would not reevaluate the strategy > to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS or > ISIL), despite its recent territorial advances, and said that the Obama > administration is still not considering boots on the ground. “This is very > early days of the strategy. The strategy is very clear. We’ll do what we > can from the air. We will support the Iraqi security forces, the Kurds, and > ultimately over time, the moderate opposition in Syria to be able to > control territory and take the fight to ISIL,” Rice told NBC’s “Meet the > Press.” > > I believe a very astute and brilliant person once stated, “the definition > of insanity is continuing to do the same thing expecting different results.” > > Would someone please advise the National Security Advisor that when the > enemy is still capable of conducting offensive operations — which the > entire world sees — you ain’t degrading nothin’ — certainly not destroying > them. > > Seems like the National Security Advisor of the United States has been > missing some intel briefings herself. First of all, it was just two weeks > ago that ISIS overran an Iraqi Army base in western Al Anbar province north > of Fallujah — more troops were massacred. > > And if she was reading this website, she’d know her boss hasn’t given the > Kurds any support whatsoever — a few airstrikes is not support, where are > the arms for the Kurds Ms. Rice? And lastly, what “moderate opposition?” > You mean the fellas who say they’ll continue to fight Bashar al-Assad > regardless of what resources we provide? Perhaps Ms. Rice needs to sit in > front of a map and understand that ISIS is at Abu Gharaib — you know that > place where the progressive socialists kept telling us about when Bush was > president. > > Here’s another example of the absurdity of Susan Rice: “There has been no > recommendation from the American military commanders, either on the ground > or here in Washington, that the United States put any ground combat forces > into Iraq. That has not come up the chain to anyone at the White House and > I don’t anticipate that it will,” Rice said. “The president has been very > plain that this is not a campaign that requires, or even would benefit > from, American ground troops in combat again.” > > I seem to recall the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs presenting such an > option before a Senate Armed Services Committee. The question is why would > these commanders bring up the option — which they did back in 2011 for a > residual force in Iraq — when you have an intransigent ideologue in Barack > Hussein Obama who, in his vast military experience, is telling the > commanders what is and is not required in this “very significant > counter-terrorism operation with many moving parts which will be conducted > over a long period of time.” > > I’m quite sure military planners have the American ground options ready to > be presented — but we have a rookie Commander-in-Chief telling them to > “talk to the hand.” > > As Oprah said about Obama, “brilliant.” > > And once again the Obama administration isn’t on the same sheet of music > as his generals — because CJCS Gen. Dempsey was on another Sunday Show > addressing same issue. As the Beacon reports, Gen. Dempsey pointed to Mosul > as an instance where U.S. ground troops may be recommended. ABC’s Martha > Raddatz asked Dempsey, “Would we be more effective against ISIS if we had > U.S. troops on the ground spotting targets?” “Yeah. There will be > circumstances when the answer to that question will likely be yes, but I > haven’t encountered one right now,” Dempsey said.” > > C’mon Gen. Dempsey, you know darn well that SOFLAMs* would be totally > effective in Kobani. > > “Mosul will likely be the decisive battle in the ground campaign at some > point in the future. When [the Iraqi Security Forces] are ready to go back > on the offensive (uh, in my lifetime?) My instinct at this point is that > that will require a different kind of advising and assisting because of the > complexity of that fight.” > > I must admit, rarely have I seen such politicized responses from the > senior uniformed leader of our military, which taken in combination with > SecDef Hagel, National Security Advisor Rice, and SecState Kerry spells > serious trouble for our Republic and its national security. > > This statement by Rice demonstrates her delusion: “Our efforts have > various, different lines of effort, as we call them. On the one hand, we’re > trying to build up the capacity of the Iraqis, which means the Iraqi army, > the Kurds – the Peshmerga inside of Iraq… we’re building up that capacity > and we have seen some success in that regard. On the Syrian side, we also > have a longer-term challenge of supporting the moderate opposition, and > giving them, while they have great will, greater capacity to fight Assad > and to fight ISIL.” So, this is going to take time,” Rice continued. “Our > air campaign is off to a strong start… it can’t be judged by merely what > happens in one particular town or in one particular region.” > > There is no air campaign. We are not building up any capacity for the > Kurdish Peshmerga Army. And where were we when the Iraqi Army got routed > just two weeks ago? > > I think it would have been better if Rice had just come out and blamed > ISIS on an anti-Islam video — she would have had more credibility sticking > to that lie than trying to make up new ones. ISIS must be laughing and > thanking the moon god Allah for its luck in arising at such a time of > American weakness and incompetence. > > *Special Operations Forces Laser Markers > > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbXZidTc1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTMyNDQxNzk-> > > > - New Members > > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaTJhdGtzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDEzMjQ0MTc5> > > 1 > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMGJzNDVnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMzI0NDE3OQ--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > >
-- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
