Geesh......You have no clue. You really don't. On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote:
> Susan Rice > --- > a silver spoon fed warmongering zionist to ignore. > > On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:47:51 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <http://allenbwest.com/> >> incompetent or just REALLY blatantly incompetent? >> >> Written by Allen West <http://allenbwest.com/author/allen/> on October >> 13, 2014 >> >> [image: rice] >> >> So I just have to wonder, will the Obama administration ever learn it’s a >> bad idea to wheel out Susan Rice on a Sunday talk show? The former U.S. >> Ambassador to the UN will always be remembered for her five Sunday talk >> show appearances where she claimed the Benghazi attack was a “spontaneous >> reaction to a crude anti-Islam video” and she was on because former >> Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “too tired” to appear. >> >> Rice later appeared as National Security Advisor on Meet The Press and >> continued to staunchly defend her original statement about the anti-Islam >> video — which we now know was a lie. She said, “That information turned >> out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct. But the notion that >> somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people >> is patently false. And I think that that’s been amply demonstrated.” >> >> Riiiight. >> >> So if there’s ANYONE you’d think Obama wouldn’t want speaking on a Sunday >> talk show it would be Susan Rice — but then hey, he probably had no clue. >> After all, he’s only been to 42.1 percent of his intel briefings. And I >> guess Obama is “too tired” from all those fundraisers. >> >> Susan Rice: Fight Against ISIS A... >> >> Inform >> >> Nonetheless, yesterday Rice — the National Security Advisor — further >> advanced the idea that she is either blatantly incompetent or just REALLY >> blatantly incompetent. >> >> As reported by the Washington Free Beacon >> <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/rice-defends-us-islamic-state-strategy/>, >> “On Sunday, Rice said the United States would not reevaluate the strategy >> to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS or >> ISIL), despite its recent territorial advances, and said that the Obama >> administration is still not considering boots on the ground. “This is very >> early days of the strategy. The strategy is very clear. We’ll do what we >> can from the air. We will support the Iraqi security forces, the Kurds, and >> ultimately over time, the moderate opposition in Syria to be able to >> control territory and take the fight to ISIL,” Rice told NBC’s “Meet the >> Press.” >> >> I believe a very astute and brilliant person once stated, “the definition >> of insanity is continuing to do the same thing expecting different results.” >> >> Would someone please advise the National Security Advisor that when the >> enemy is still capable of conducting offensive operations — which the >> entire world sees — you ain’t degrading nothin’ — certainly not destroying >> them. >> >> Seems like the National Security Advisor of the United States has been >> missing some intel briefings herself. First of all, it was just two weeks >> ago that ISIS overran an Iraqi Army base in western Al Anbar province north >> of Fallujah — more troops were massacred. >> >> And if she was reading this website, she’d know her boss hasn’t given the >> Kurds any support whatsoever — a few airstrikes is not support, where are >> the arms for the Kurds Ms. Rice? And lastly, what “moderate opposition?” >> You mean the fellas who say they’ll continue to fight Bashar al-Assad >> regardless of what resources we provide? Perhaps Ms. Rice needs to sit in >> front of a map and understand that ISIS is at Abu Gharaib — you know that >> place where the progressive socialists kept telling us about when Bush was >> president. >> >> Here’s another example of the absurdity of Susan Rice: “There has been no >> recommendation from the American military commanders, either on the ground >> or here in Washington, that the United States put any ground combat forces >> into Iraq. That has not come up the chain to anyone at the White House and >> I don’t anticipate that it will,” Rice said. “The president has been very >> plain that this is not a campaign that requires, or even would benefit >> from, American ground troops in combat again.” >> >> I seem to recall the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs presenting such an >> option before a Senate Armed Services Committee. The question is why would >> these commanders bring up the option — which they did back in 2011 for a >> residual force in Iraq — when you have an intransigent ideologue in Barack >> Hussein Obama who, in his vast military experience, is telling the >> commanders what is and is not required in this “very significant >> counter-terrorism operation with many moving parts which will be conducted >> over a long period of time.” >> >> I’m quite sure military planners have the American ground options ready >> to be presented — but we have a rookie Commander-in-Chief telling them to >> “talk to the hand.” >> >> As Oprah said about Obama, “brilliant.” >> >> And once again the Obama administration isn’t on the same sheet of music >> as his generals — because CJCS Gen. Dempsey was on another Sunday Show >> addressing same issue. As the Beacon reports, Gen. Dempsey pointed to Mosul >> as an instance where U.S. ground troops may be recommended. ABC’s Martha >> Raddatz asked Dempsey, “Would we be more effective against ISIS if we had >> U.S. troops on the ground spotting targets?” “Yeah. There will be >> circumstances when the answer to that question will likely be yes, but I >> haven’t encountered one right now,” Dempsey said.” >> >> C’mon Gen. Dempsey, you know darn well that SOFLAMs* would be totally >> effective in Kobani. >> >> “Mosul will likely be the decisive battle in the ground campaign at some >> point in the future. When [the Iraqi Security Forces] are ready to go back >> on the offensive (uh, in my lifetime?) My instinct at this point is that >> that will require a different kind of advising and assisting because of the >> complexity of that fight.” >> >> I must admit, rarely have I seen such politicized responses from the >> senior uniformed leader of our military, which taken in combination with >> SecDef Hagel, National Security Advisor Rice, and SecState Kerry spells >> serious trouble for our Republic and its national security. >> >> This statement by Rice demonstrates her delusion: “Our efforts have >> various, different lines of effort, as we call them. On the one hand, we’re >> trying to build up the capacity of the Iraqis, which means the Iraqi army, >> the Kurds – the Peshmerga inside of Iraq… we’re building up that capacity >> and we have seen some success in that regard. On the Syrian side, we also >> have a longer-term challenge of supporting the moderate opposition, and >> giving them, while they have great will, greater capacity to fight Assad >> and to fight ISIL.” So, this is going to take time,” Rice continued. “Our >> air campaign is off to a strong start… it can’t be judged by merely what >> happens in one particular town or in one particular region.” >> >> There is no air campaign. We are not building up any capacity for the >> Kurdish Peshmerga Army. And where were we when the Iraqi Army got routed >> just two weeks ago? >> >> I think it would have been better if Rice had just come out and blamed >> ISIS on an anti-Islam video — she would have had more credibility sticking >> to that lie than trying to make up new ones. ISIS must be laughing and >> thanking the moon god Allah for its luck in arising at such a time of >> American weakness and incompetence. >> >> *Special Operations Forces Laser Markers >> >> >> >> >> __._,_.___ >> ------------------------------ >> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> Visit Your Group >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbXZidTc1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTMyNDQxNzk-> >> >> - New Members >> >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaTJhdGtzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDEzMjQ0MTc5> >> 1 >> >> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMGJzNDVnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMzI0NDE3OQ--> >> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >> >> __,_._,___ >> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
