Imagine that, having to write LAWS that will prevent Democrats from
trying to subvert, and outright deny our Constitution.
You mean that you don't want democrats to follow in Boy Georges footsteps
and follow the republican example of the last eight years?? just a tad bit
hypocritical , isn't it??
The laws for succession are in place... regardless of why an elected
president is unable to serve.
ONLY a republican would think it necessary to ("having to write LAWS that
will prevent") bypass legislation and laws that are in place.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 5:51 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Again, those records are OBVIOUSLY not necessary to run for president.
>
>
> In your tiny little mind perhaps...
>
> They may well prove to be "necessary" for him to assume the Office,
> should he happen to Win.
>
> And after that, it seems we will be left to decide what to do about a
> process, and Party, that would attempt to Elect a person who was NOT
> Constitutionally qualified...
>
> Imagine that, having to write LAWS that will prevent Democrats from
> trying to subvert, and outright deny our Constitution.
>
> >
>
--
Mark M. Kahle
Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
