Or is it only "Law" when it doesn't interfere with your Loony Liberal
Agenda?!?!?!?!?!?
Read my post,.... this question is rediculous.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good, then there should be no question as to whether a Candidate
> should be made to "prove" his Citizenship, right?
>
> Or is it only "Law" when it doesn't interfere with your Loony Liberal
> Agenda?!?!?!?!?!?
>
>
> On Nov 3, 11:26 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > unlike you and your fearless leader georgie girl (read your post), i
> > consider constitutional provision as law. not, to paraphrase him (and
> you),
> > 'just a piece of paper'.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 3, 11:17 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > ONLY a republican would think it necessary to ("having to write LAWS
> that
> > > > will prevent") bypass legislation and laws that are in place.
> >
> > > When such Laws don't support the Constitution, you bet.
> >
> > > Please provide a LINK to ANY Law that currently has a President
> > > "proving" he is Constitutionally eligible?
> >
> > > I'll wait here.
> >
> > > Or don't you think Constitutional requirements are important to the
> > > process?
> >
> > --
> > Mark M. Kahle
> > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me-
> Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>
--
Mark M. Kahle
Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
