unlike you and your fearless leader georgie girl (read your post), i
consider constitutional provision as law. not, to paraphrase him (and you),
'just a piece of paper'.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 11:17 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ONLY a republican would think it necessary to ("having to write LAWS that
> > will prevent") bypass legislation and laws that are in place.
>
>
> When such Laws don't support the Constitution, you bet.
>
> Please provide a LINK to ANY Law that currently has a President
> "proving" he is Constitutionally eligible?
>
> I'll wait here.
>
> Or don't you think Constitutional requirements are important to the
> process?
>
> >
>
--
Mark M. Kahle
Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
