On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you say...
be specific with this. i do not want to be as you are and assume your
meaning.
>
>
> And yet, when questioned on "standing", you "claim" there is no
> Legislation, and it is therefor something that cannot be supported
> JUST by the Constitution itself.
I never claimed that. YOU did, by saying it would be necessary to enact said
same.
>
>
> Imagine that, you are either a Hypocrite, or you haven't got a CLUE
> about the things you say here.
If you would learn to read that which is written you would apologize.
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 11:34 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or is it only "Law" when it doesn't interfere with your Loony Liberal
> > Agenda?!?!?!?!?!?
> > Read my post,.... this question is rediculous.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Good, then there should be no question as to whether a Candidate
> > > should be made to "prove" his Citizenship, right?
> >
> > > Or is it only "Law" when it doesn't interfere with your Loony Liberal
> > > Agenda?!?!?!?!?!?
> >
> > > On Nov 3, 11:26 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > unlike you and your fearless leader georgie girl (read your post), i
> > > > consider constitutional provision as law. not, to paraphrase him (and
> > > you),
> > > > 'just a piece of paper'.
> >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Nov 3, 11:17 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > ONLY a republican would think it necessary to ("having to write
> LAWS
> > > that
> > > > > > will prevent") bypass legislation and laws that are in place.
> >
> > > > > When such Laws don't support the Constitution, you bet.
> >
> > > > > Please provide a LINK to ANY Law that currently has a President
> > > > > "proving" he is Constitutionally eligible?
> >
> > > > > I'll wait here.
> >
> > > > > Or don't you think Constitutional requirements are important to the
> > > > > process?
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Mark M. Kahle
> > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me-
> > > Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > --
> > Mark M. Kahle
> > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me-
> Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>
--
Mark M. Kahle
Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
