And as again is typical, you've refuted nothing. As a side note, (this isn't something new or novel; I realized this years ago during Roberts' ruling on the AFA); you must possess common sense. It's requisite in life, and most especially when "Patriots/Militia/Minute-Men/Tax-Protestors" such as yourself start attempting to define and describe the Constitution; the Federalist Papers or the Anti-Federalist Papers.
You should work on that Michael.... On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > With regard to the militias, yes. > > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:27 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Except you PLUCKED what you wanted (which still does not provide the >> power/authority you claim). >> >> The ENTIRE sentence is: >> >> >> *The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the >> United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into >> the actual Service of the United States; *Note the QUALIFIER "*when >> called into actual service*". >> The CONGRESS does this. >> >> The AIIS2C1 nonsense was already refuted. >> >> Any other guesses? >> >> Regard$, >> --MJ >> >> "The military state is the final form to which every planned economy >> tends rapidly." ~ Isabel Paterson >> >> >> >> >> At 01:18 PM 4/11/2017, you wrote: >> >> I did this yesterday, and for you to ignore it is typical.  >> >> I repeat, *"Whether You Like It~~Or Don't Like It;  It Is~~What It Is"* >> and the words are quite clear, concise and distinct. Article II,  >> Section II: >> >> *"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the >> United States, and of the Militia of the several States,"* >> >> (Please Take Note Of The Commas!) >> >> As compared to Article I, Section VIII;  Paragraph XI: >> >> "*To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules >> concerning Captures on Land and Water"*; >> >> (Emphasis added....I hope this helps you!) >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:54 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> The only one "clouding the issue" is you. >> >> Again, HERE is the Constitution: >> https://www.usconstitution.net/const.txt >> >> Point to the Article, Section and Clause or Amendment you imagine >> provides the President with the Power/Authority to bomb/attack/whatever you >> want to call it (what occurred recently regarding Syria) >> All your other machinations are wholly irrelevant. >> That you (again) fail to provide such merely affirms reality. >> >> Regard$, >> --MJ >> >> "Preventive war was an invention of Hitler. Frankly, I would not even >> listen to anyone seriously that came and talked about such a thing." -- >> Dwight Eisenhower, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 10:14 AM 4/11/2017, you wrote: >> >> Good Morning Michael; >> >> Although you're attempting to cloud the issue, and play a game of >> semantics:  I'll play! >> >> There's a distinction between what one may term, "An Act of War"; versus, >> "Waging War"; and specifically, the ability to "Declare War";  and >> there's nothing in the Constitution that prohibits the Commander in Chief, >> (Again, See Article II Section II) from taking what the Commander in Chief >> mandates, concludes or proscribes as requisite steps for the safety and >> security of the Nation and the American People. It has always been >> considered in our Nation, (stemming from the British Common Law) that the >> very nature and "Conduct of War" is an "Executive Power" granted to the >> President....Period. >> >> As I pointed out yesterday, for Congress to place some restriction or >> quagmire on the President from taking such steps as President Trump engaged >> in last week in Syria; or to deny the President the ability to function as >> the Commander in Chief and to direct our military into necessary >> engagements in order to preserve National Security;  as per the dictates >> of Article II Section II, would be Unconstitutional; and a misreading of >> the Constitution or the intent by our Forefathers. >> >> Troop Strength is not at all a factor in this;  (although I, in a sense >> referenced that yesterday);  what is required is the "Engagement of War"; >> (Or the "Declaration of War";  which has not happened in this situation, >> and those of you who argue that the President's "Act" was somehow >> Unconstitutional continue to fail to acknowledge that!);  which entails a >> purpose; goal, and requires "Multiple Acts" other than a one time, one hour >> missile engagement! Granted,  the Trump Administration's actions in >> Syria last week may be construed as an aggressive military engagement; or >> even an "Act of War"; but it was not a, "Declaration of War"; and far from >> meeting the definition of "Waging War". >> >> It's just not, and for you to not be able to fathom this, in my opinion >> is quite telling. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:44 AM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> [image: Image may contain: meme and text]  Â >> >> >> >> There is no continuous ongoing engagement or conflict;  there's no >> designation of troops or anything more than a one time engagement which >> falls into the powers designated to the President under Article II Section >> 2 of the Constitution.  To interpret the action by Presiddent Trump >> in any other fashion would literally be Unconstitutional.... >> >> -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For >> options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum  >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's >> active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest >> breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are >> subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe >> from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to >> [email protected]. For more options, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>  >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>  >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
