(<Grin>!  Good to see ya Michael!)


On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:38 AM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Been busy, but this remains in the to respond ........
>
>
> :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 02:21 PM 4/11/2017, you wrote:
>
> Okay, again, I choose to play!
>
> Let's utilize (at least a portion) of your hypothesis, (obviously you
> haven't thought this out real well, because our Forefathers had no
> comparison to an Air Force, Tomahawk Missiles, or "B0mbs" as you refer to
> it) but in general, the Forefathers did have the ability to foresee
> scenarios that the Commander In Chief may see, be forced to engage in or
> experience.
>
> Under your theory; the President would have to go before Congress and
> obtain approval from the majority of the 535 Members before he was able to
> direct any military action; bar none. Â Â
>
> Under your theory, each and every "Event" could be construed as a war;
> meaning that during World War II, the only action that President Roosevelt
> would have been authorized to engage in were the Japanese in and around the
> Hawaiian islands....Nowhere else, to include Guam, the Philippines, the
> Islands of Japan; nor Europe, Â Africa or anywhere else where hostilities
> were taking place. Â
>
> Obviously this is what you (Rand Paul, Â Tulsi Gabert and others who are
> not boned up on Constitutional Law) are calling for!
>
> What if Iran's Hezbollah attacks the mainland of the United States, and we
> have the ability to attack this Hezbollah force before the leave the
> mainland of the United States.  Does the President still seek out a
> declaration of war from the Congress?  Back seventy-seven years ago, it
> only took about 26 hours....I doubt very seriously if the 115th Congress
> could act as hastily today.
>
> What about the potential of a nuclear attack by Crisco over in
> Pyongyang?  Let's assume that we learn of the potential of a nuclear
> attack; but have the ability to prevent such an attack by a pre-emptive
> strike.  Does a President have to go to the 535 Members in order to be
> blessed with protecting our National Security? Â
>
> The concept for which you and others attempt to frame is ludicrous and has
> NEVER been the intent of our Forefathers, nor is it mandated by the
> Congress.  As stated: Â
>
> To "Declare War" has a goal; Â an objective; and most importantly a
> conclusion and finite ending; (no matter the victor!)
>
> That was not the case last week when Trump ordered the launch of missiles
> against a very limited target.
>
> Your "Fallacy" argument is stale.  It reminds me of those Secular
> Progressives when defeated and not capable of framing an intelligent
> answer, reverting to the name calling of 
> "Racist/Homophobe/Islamophobe/Bigot".....It's
> unbecoming.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:47 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The expected and anticipated fallacy spew ... your signature move when all
> else has failed.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> If you don't like someone, the way he holds his spoon makes you furious;
> if you like him, he can turn his plate over into your lap and you won't
> mind. -- Irving Becker
>
>
>
> At 01:34 PM 4/11/2017, you wrote:
>
> And as again is typical, you've refuted nothing.Â
>
> As a side note, (this isn't something new or novel; Â I realized this
> years ago during Roberts' ruling on the AFA); Â you must possess common
> sense.  It's requisite in life, and most especially when
> "Patriots/Militia/Minute-Men/Tax-Protestors" such as yourself start
> attempting to define and describe the Constitution; the Federalist Papers
> or the Anti-Federalist Papers.
>
> You should work on that Michael....
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected] >
> wrote: With regard to the militias, yes.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:27 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Except you PLUCKED what you wanted (which still does not provide the
> power/authority you claim).
> The ENTIRE sentence is: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the
> Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several
> States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;
> Note the QUALIFIER "when called into actual service". The CONGRESS does
> this.
> The AIIS2C1 nonsense was already refuted.
> Any other guesses?
> Regard$, --MJ
> "The military state is the final form to which every planned economy tends
> rapidly." ~ Isabel Paterson
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to