On Nov 12, 7:05 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: please explain how the fairness doctrine is related to censorship .
==== What else would you call it? Talk radio, and for that matter, AM radio was dead in this Nation until the Fairness Doctrine was lifted. In a free market economy, (and I understand that you don't subscribe to, and want to see our Nation's free market economy destroyed) it has now been established that conservative talk radio was successful, clearly, there was a market for this, unlike Moonbat radio, where the results were dismal. See Air America. So, what you, and the likes of Chuck Schumer, Hil, the California contingent, (e.g.; Maxine Waters, DiFi, Babs, Nanc, et. al) are proposing, is to step in, and "correct" something that is working, by mandating a format that is by definition, a miserable failure. This will come to haunt the socialists, for it it passes, mark my words, there will be litigation to force all major networks to apply the same standards to its news reporting, which is biased and partisan, as well as any other entertainment forum. I don't believe that President elect Obama will be dumb enough to tackle this, it remains to be seen whether idiot Moonbats in Congress can muster enough support. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
