come on murky, show us all where free speech is being so repressed today thet there is an overwhelming need for the unfairness doctrine. we are waiting.........
On Nov 13, 7:41 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He won't because he can't! > > On Nov 13, 4:52 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > when you find free speech inside the unfairness doctrine, point it out > > will ya? and please show us all where there is no free speech now? > >e wai > On Nov 13, 2:30 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > great i am glad to see you are finally coming on board the free speech > > > for all express ! > > > > On Nov 12, 2:16 pm, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I will break my rule and play along here..... > > > > > Under the proposed "new" Fairness Doctrine, the government would > > > > restrict a broadcaster that is broadcasting on the public airwaves, > > > > from putting out a marketable product, in this case, conservative talk > > > > radio, without putting on an (equal in time, duration, and format) > > > > unmarketable product, e.g.; for lack of a better term, "liberal talk > > > > radio". > > > > > As you well know, the goal of these idiotic Congressmen and Senators, > > > > is to silence conservative talk radio, plain and simple. They know > > > > that liberal radio is a failure, and is not something that Americans > > > > have chosen to listen to. No advertiser is going to buy time on such > > > > a program. > > > > > How is it that you have come to believe that such a proposed policy > > > > (and I quote) is "free speech for all not just some!" ? > > > > > In other words, you are advocating that the government mandate to > > > > broadcasters who utilize the public airwaves to put on products that > > > > are un-marketable. > > > > > First, the proposed new Fairness Doctrine will be applicable to all of > > > > the public airwaves, and I'm telling ya Lil' Mikey, you and your > > > > socialist brethren are biting off more than they can chew here, if > > > > Moonbats in Congress go forward with this, (and as I have stated, I > > > > don't think they are that stupid) > > > > > Such legislation will open up the floodgate of litigation, thereby > > > > forcing the four major broadcasters, e.g.; FOX CBS, NBC and ABC in > > > > all likelihood to revamp not only their radio broadcasts, but their > > > > television broadcasts. Conservatives will force the Fairness Doctrine > > > > to be applied to all facets of the public airwaves, and it will > > > > forever change the way that you and other Moonbats receive your > > > > Moonbat theories, and regurgitated liberal spin. The major > > > > Broadcasters will be out of the news broadcasting business, because > > > > they will be forced to give a fair, balanced news reporting show, > > > > (much like FOX News does today) and entertainment television will > > > > change, in that any controversial subject matter with those "hidden > > > > agenda" messages that the Hollywood socialist-elitists have been > > > > utilizing for the past two decades will be subject to the Fairness > > > > Doctrine, and a battery of lawyers who are chomping at the bit to > > > > challenge such legislation! > > > > > I for one, welcome the Fairness Doctrine! I see my billable hours > > > > going up ten fold! > > > > > On Nov 12, 1:47 pm, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > [ What else would you call it?] > > > > > i would call it free speech for all not just some ! > > > > > On Nov 12, 11:04 am, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 12, 7:05 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > please explain how the fairness doctrine is related to censorship . > > > > > > > ==== > > > > > > > What else would you call it? Talk radio, and for that matter, AM > > > > > > radio was dead in this Nation until the Fairness Doctrine was > > > > > > lifted. > > > > > > In a free market economy, (and I understand that you don't subscribe > > > > > > to, and want to see our Nation's free market economy destroyed) it > > > > > > has now been established that conservative talk radio was > > > > > > successful, > > > > > > clearly, there was a market for this, unlike Moonbat radio, where > > > > > > the > > > > > > results were dismal. See Air America. > > > > > > > So, what you, and the likes of Chuck Schumer, Hil, the California > > > > > > contingent, (e.g.; Maxine Waters, DiFi, Babs, Nanc, et. al) are > > > > > > proposing, is to step in, and "correct" something that is working, > > > > > > by > > > > > > mandating a format that is by definition, a miserable failure. > > > > > > > This will come to haunt the socialists, for it it passes, mark my > > > > > > words, there will be litigation to force all major networks to apply > > > > > > the same standards to its news reporting, which is biased and > > > > > > partisan, as well as any other entertainment forum. > > > > > > > I don't believe that President elect Obama will be dumb enough to > > > > > > tackle this, it remains to be seen whether idiot Moonbats in > > > > > > Congress > > > > > > can muster enough support.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
