[ What else would you call it?] i would call it free speech for all not just some ! On Nov 12, 11:04 am, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 12, 7:05 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > please explain how the fairness doctrine is related to censorship . > > ==== > > What else would you call it? Talk radio, and for that matter, AM > radio was dead in this Nation until the Fairness Doctrine was lifted. > In a free market economy, (and I understand that you don't subscribe > to, and want to see our Nation's free market economy destroyed) it > has now been established that conservative talk radio was successful, > clearly, there was a market for this, unlike Moonbat radio, where the > results were dismal. See Air America. > > So, what you, and the likes of Chuck Schumer, Hil, the California > contingent, (e.g.; Maxine Waters, DiFi, Babs, Nanc, et. al) are > proposing, is to step in, and "correct" something that is working, by > mandating a format that is by definition, a miserable failure. > > This will come to haunt the socialists, for it it passes, mark my > words, there will be litigation to force all major networks to apply > the same standards to its news reporting, which is biased and > partisan, as well as any other entertainment forum. > > I don't believe that President elect Obama will be dumb enough to > tackle this, it remains to be seen whether idiot Moonbats in Congress > can muster enough support. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
