gaar,

The $700 billion pay-out will be paid for my the next couple of
generations of Americans. Of course the tax-payers, both private and
corporate ,will pay for the nationalized health care. But at least
they will be getting something tangible for it...health care.
i didn't hear you whining about the government being broke when Wall
Street hand their hands out.

I thought you were desperate to save the auto manufacturers money?

On Nov 16, 5:43 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So instead of just paying for it yourself, you want to make it yet
> another thing you burden future Generations of Americans
> with?!?!?!?!?!?
>
> You understand the Government is broke, right?
>
> So basically you want us to borrow even more of our childrens money so
> that you don't have to pay for it yourself...
>
> Typical Loony Liberal.
>
> On Nov 16, 3:29 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gaar,
>
> > See my previous post. Nationalizing health care would take a
> > tremoundous financial burden off the auto companies books. That's also
> > a big cost of doing business.
>
> > On Nov 16, 2:57 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > A Big paret of the "cost" of their doing Business is BECAUSE of the
> > > UAW...
>
> > > Over $1,500 per Vehicle before anything else is paid for, and those in
> > > the U.S. WITHOUT Union Labor have the SAME costs at just about $200 -
> > > $300 per Vehicle, not to mention the lower wages the non-Union Shops
> > > get AFTER those initial costs.
>
> > > On Nov 16, 12:49 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > gaar,
>
> > > > Really? I figured the "check" would be made the The General Motors
> > > > Corporation and not the United Auto Workers Union. You know otherwise?
>
> > > > On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Yep...
>
> > > > > Why is it ok, with you, to help the best paid workers in the U.S.?
>
> > > > > It is their wages that are pricing the Goods they produce out of the
> > > > > Market, yet you want to continue to support such failed Policies.
>
> > > > > Why is that you suppose?
>
> > > > > On Nov 16, 11:17 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > gaar,
>
> > > > > > ONLY 3 million jobs?
>
> > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:23 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 16, 5:39 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > if the auto industry fails it will trigger another great 
> > > > > > > > depression .
>
> > > > > > > Bullshit.
>
> > > > > > > All it will trigger is the loss of some 3 Million Union Jobs.
>
> > > > > > > And MAKE the Auto makers either get competitive, or others will 
> > > > > > > do it
> > > > > > > for them.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to