Hollywood,

If that's the case then why all the anti-religion hysteria?  Don't you
agree the reaction to this combo ticket idea was more than just a
little over the top?

And I'm pretty sure you meant Big Bang, problem and controversy
ended.  :)


On Dec 8, 5:16 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> frankg,
>
> Jesus, but this is a no-brainer.
> Evolution is pretty much a scientific fact. God created the process of
> evolution. Bada-Boom, Badda-Bing. problem and controversy ended.
>
> On Dec 8, 4:07 pm, frankg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > But it's OK for taxpayer money to promote evolution?  It's not like
> > the theory of evolution is a proven fact either. Both evolution and
> > creation are unproven theories yet you object to only one where
> > taxpayer money is involved. Most people question where we came from
> > and like it or not, there are two principal theories; creation and
> > evolution. People should not be afraid of exploring either.
>
> > What makes this even more ridiculous is that all they were doing was
> > offering a combo ticket to their respective events - The Festival of
> > Lights and the Christmas celebration, Bethlehem’s Blessing. It wasn't
> > like the zoo was endorsing the museum. It was two seasonal events
> > teaming up to make it cheaper for people to see them both. The
> > response to this was borderlines on anti-religious hysteria. And
> > because of this hysterical reaction, and the zoo caving into it, those
> > who wanted to see both events ended up paying more to do so.
>
> > On Dec 8, 3:50 pm, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > i think it is a good idea ! tax payer money should not be spent to
> > > promote a religious theory
>
> > > On Dec 8, 11:52 am, frankg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Mike,
>
> > > > You didn't say whether you thought this was a good decision or not,
> > > > and if you do, why?
>
> > > > On Dec 8, 6:55 am, Liberal mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Some complained that the zoo, which receives public support through a
> > > > > tax levy, should not become involved with a private museum dedicated
> > > > > to the teachings of the Bible’s Book of Genesis. Others said a
> > > > > scientific institution shouldn’t link itself to a place that argues
> > > > > man once lived side by side with dinosaurs.
>
> > > > > On Dec 8, 6:49 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > more attacks on religion by the insane leftists.  no surprise.
>
> > > > > > On Dec 8, 6:29 am, Liberal mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Zoo pulls Creation Museum promotion
> > > > > > >  The Cincinnati Zoo and the Creation Museum launched a joint
> > > > > > > promotional deal last week to draw attention to their holiday
> > > > > > > attractions.http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20081201/NEWS01/81201045
>
> > > > > > >  It worked, but not the way zoo and museum officials had hoped.
>
> > > > > > > The zoo pulled out of the deal Monday after receiving dozens of 
> > > > > > > angry
> > > > > > > calls and e-mails about the partnership, which offered reduced 
> > > > > > > prices
> > > > > > > to anyone who bought tickets to the zoo’s Festival of Lights and 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > museum’s Christmas celebration, Bethlehem’s Blessing.
>
> > > > > > > Most of the protests echoed the same theme: the Creation Museum
> > > > > > > promotes a religious point of view that conflicts with the zoo’s
> > > > > > > scientific mission.
>
> > > > > > > Some complained that the zoo, which receives public support 
> > > > > > > through a
> > > > > > > tax levy, should not become involved with a private museum 
> > > > > > > dedicated
> > > > > > > to the teachings of the Bible’s Book of Genesis. Others said a
> > > > > > > scientific institution shouldn’t link itself to a place that 
> > > > > > > argues
> > > > > > > man once lived side by side with dinosaurs.
>
> > > > > > > “They seem like diametrically opposed institutions,” said Dr. 
> > > > > > > James
> > > > > > > Leach, a Cincinnati radiologist who e-mailed zoo officials about 
> > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > concerns. “The Cincinnati Zoo is one of this city’s treasures. The
> > > > > > > Creation Museum is an international laughingstock.”
>
> > > > > > > Zoo officials said they considered the promotion – dubbed “Two 
> > > > > > > Great
> > > > > > > Attractions, One Great Deal” – a marketing deal no different than
> > > > > > > other cross-promotions they do with institutions like the Newport
> > > > > > > Aquarium or the Cincinnati Reds.
>
> > > > > > > Instead, they found themselves mired in a heated debate between
> > > > > > > creationists and evolutionists over the origins of mankind. 
> > > > > > > Thanks to
> > > > > > > the Internet, the opposition needed only a few days to organize a
> > > > > > > worldwide e-mail campaign and to set up a zoo boycott through 
> > > > > > > blogs
> > > > > > > and a Facebook page.
>
> > > > > > > “It’s not about us endorsing them or them endorsing us,” said Chad
> > > > > > > Yelton, a zoo spokesman. “That wasn’t the intention of anything we
> > > > > > > were doing.”
>
> > > > > > > The Creation Museum’s founder, Ken Ham, said the Petersburg, Ky.,
> > > > > > > museum and the zoo spent months preparing the cross-promotion
> > > > > > > package.
> > > > > > > He said the zoo’s decision to cut ties after two days was
> > > > > > > disappointing and a missed opportunity to boost regional tourism.
>
> > > > > > > Ham said he was “personally saddened” by the negative response.
>
> > > > > > > “It’s a pity that intolerant people have pushed for our expulsion
> > > > > > > simply because of our Christian faith,” Ham said in a statement.
> > > > > > > “Some
> > > > > > > of their comments … reveal great intolerance for anything having 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > with Christianity.”
>
> > > > > > > The museum, which opened in May 2007, has been praised by 
> > > > > > > supporters
> > > > > > > as a bulwark against evolutionary teachings. It also has been
> > > > > > > ridiculed by critics who say its displays, including a triceratops
> > > > > > > with a saddle on its back, are based on pseudo science.
>
> > > > > > > The ticket deal first appeared on web sites for both institutions
> > > > > > > Friday, offering a price of $25.95 for one ticket to both the
> > > > > > > Festival
> > > > > > > of Lights and Bethlehem’s Blessing, which features a live nativity
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > a recreation of the streets of Bethlehem 2,000 years ago.
>
> > > > > > > But Yelton said the uproar became such a distraction by Monday
> > > > > > > morning
> > > > > > > that zoo officials decided to pull it from the web site.
>
> > > > > > > No package deals had been sold, so no refunds will be necessary.
>
> > > > > > > “When we partner with the Reds, we don’t get these kinds of 
> > > > > > > e-mails,”
> > > > > > > Yelton said. “It’s pretty clear this is more of a distraction.”- 
> > > > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to