tax payer money should not be spent on any religion period . On Dec 8, 5:07 pm, frankg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But it's OK for taxpayer money to promote evolution? It's not like > the theory of evolution is a proven fact either. Both evolution and > creation are unproven theories yet you object to only one where > taxpayer money is involved. Most people question where we came from > and like it or not, there are two principal theories; creation and > evolution. People should not be afraid of exploring either. > > What makes this even more ridiculous is that all they were doing was > offering a combo ticket to their respective events - The Festival of > Lights and the Christmas celebration, Bethlehem’s Blessing. It wasn't > like the zoo was endorsing the museum. It was two seasonal events > teaming up to make it cheaper for people to see them both. The > response to this was borderlines on anti-religious hysteria. And > because of this hysterical reaction, and the zoo caving into it, those > who wanted to see both events ended up paying more to do so. > > On Dec 8, 3:50 pm, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > i think it is a good idea ! tax payer money should not be spent to > > promote a religious theory > > > On Dec 8, 11:52 am, frankg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mike, > > > > You didn't say whether you thought this was a good decision or not, > > > and if you do, why? > > > > On Dec 8, 6:55 am, Liberal mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Some complained that the zoo, which receives public support through a > > > > tax levy, should not become involved with a private museum dedicated > > > > to the teachings of the Bible’s Book of Genesis. Others said a > > > > scientific institution shouldn’t link itself to a place that argues > > > > man once lived side by side with dinosaurs. > > > > > On Dec 8, 6:49 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > more attacks on religion by the insane leftists. no surprise. > > > > > > On Dec 8, 6:29 am, Liberal mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Zoo pulls Creation Museum promotion > > > > > > The Cincinnati Zoo and the Creation Museum launched a joint > > > > > > promotional deal last week to draw attention to their holiday > > > > > > attractions.http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20081201/NEWS01/81201045 > > > > > > > It worked, but not the way zoo and museum officials had hoped. > > > > > > > The zoo pulled out of the deal Monday after receiving dozens of > > > > > > angry > > > > > > calls and e-mails about the partnership, which offered reduced > > > > > > prices > > > > > > to anyone who bought tickets to the zoo’s Festival of Lights and the > > > > > > museum’s Christmas celebration, Bethlehem’s Blessing. > > > > > > > Most of the protests echoed the same theme: the Creation Museum > > > > > > promotes a religious point of view that conflicts with the zoo’s > > > > > > scientific mission. > > > > > > > Some complained that the zoo, which receives public support through > > > > > > a > > > > > > tax levy, should not become involved with a private museum dedicated > > > > > > to the teachings of the Bible’s Book of Genesis. Others said a > > > > > > scientific institution shouldn’t link itself to a place that argues > > > > > > man once lived side by side with dinosaurs. > > > > > > > “They seem like diametrically opposed institutions,” said Dr. James > > > > > > Leach, a Cincinnati radiologist who e-mailed zoo officials about his > > > > > > concerns. “The Cincinnati Zoo is one of this city’s treasures. The > > > > > > Creation Museum is an international laughingstock.” > > > > > > > Zoo officials said they considered the promotion – dubbed “Two Great > > > > > > Attractions, One Great Deal” – a marketing deal no different than > > > > > > other cross-promotions they do with institutions like the Newport > > > > > > Aquarium or the Cincinnati Reds. > > > > > > > Instead, they found themselves mired in a heated debate between > > > > > > creationists and evolutionists over the origins of mankind. Thanks > > > > > > to > > > > > > the Internet, the opposition needed only a few days to organize a > > > > > > worldwide e-mail campaign and to set up a zoo boycott through blogs > > > > > > and a Facebook page. > > > > > > > “It’s not about us endorsing them or them endorsing us,” said Chad > > > > > > Yelton, a zoo spokesman. “That wasn’t the intention of anything we > > > > > > were doing.” > > > > > > > The Creation Museum’s founder, Ken Ham, said the Petersburg, Ky., > > > > > > museum and the zoo spent months preparing the cross-promotion > > > > > > package. > > > > > > He said the zoo’s decision to cut ties after two days was > > > > > > disappointing and a missed opportunity to boost regional tourism. > > > > > > > Ham said he was “personally saddened” by the negative response. > > > > > > > “It’s a pity that intolerant people have pushed for our expulsion > > > > > > simply because of our Christian faith,” Ham said in a statement. > > > > > > “Some > > > > > > of their comments … reveal great intolerance for anything having to > > > > > > do > > > > > > with Christianity.” > > > > > > > The museum, which opened in May 2007, has been praised by supporters > > > > > > as a bulwark against evolutionary teachings. It also has been > > > > > > ridiculed by critics who say its displays, including a triceratops > > > > > > with a saddle on its back, are based on pseudo science. > > > > > > > The ticket deal first appeared on web sites for both institutions > > > > > > Friday, offering a price of $25.95 for one ticket to both the > > > > > > Festival > > > > > > of Lights and Bethlehem’s Blessing, which features a live nativity > > > > > > and > > > > > > a recreation of the streets of Bethlehem 2,000 years ago. > > > > > > > But Yelton said the uproar became such a distraction by Monday > > > > > > morning > > > > > > that zoo officials decided to pull it from the web site. > > > > > > > No package deals had been sold, so no refunds will be necessary. > > > > > > > “When we partner with the Reds, we don’t get these kinds of > > > > > > e-mails,” > > > > > > Yelton said. “It’s pretty clear this is more of a distraction.”- > > > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
