Then that should extend to their food which has been drenched with lethal chemicals since the 50's or 60's. "Silent Spring"-Rachel Carson
On Mar 15, 9:59�am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > see? We can come to middle ground. I do get riled when someone like > Americanbuiltus gets nasty and attacks. My daughter smokes and as > someone who did it for 30 plus years, I do know what it feels like to > be put outside to smoke. But of course since I'm done with it, I don't > mind at all being able to go anywhere and not 'deal' with it. I do > draw the line at people being told what they can and can't do in their > own homes and cars. There are some cases where smokers living in a > townhome like residence ( that they owned) were sued by non- smokers > because the smoke was coming through the walls. In this case, it > should have been in writting when the person �who was buying the > townhome that no smoking would be allowed. If you own it, its your to > smoke in or not smoke in. Now before you say buisness owners sit in > the same pot....no, it's not the same. Restuarants and bars and such > have health officals checking lots of stuff out in their buisnesses. > When its for the public use...its different than private home > ownership. > > On Mar 15, 8:48�am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I agree with that. > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:32 AM, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don't have a problem with that. The problem prior to the ban was > > > 'every' restuarant allowed smoking. If it were divided up and there > > > where an equal number of licenses for smoking and non smoking > > > establishments( I don't want to drive 12 miles to find a smokefree > > > place) that would be an equatablesolution. But until that would > > > happen...I'm enjoying the clean air. > > > On Mar 15, 8:24 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey Darlin', > > > > > How would you feel about establishments being able to declare themselves > > > > smoking or non-smoking ?? > > > > > Smokers don't enter non-smoking establishments and non-smokers don't > > > enter > > > > smoking permitted establishments. > > > > > Shouldn't everyone be able to be accommodated and have a choice as to > > > where > > > > to go without government interference (again) in a legal pursuit ? > > > > > I agree that malls, stores, and Government buildings should be smoke > > > > free > > > as > > > > it is not possible to segregate in these places. > > > > �> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:08 AM, NavyBrat <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > That's right...I don't care about you standing in the cold . I did it > > > > > for years and didn't bitch and moan about it. I never smoked in my own > > > > > home when my children lived there. Because any fool knows ciggerettes > > > > > aren't good for developing lungs. It's the law now and I don't feel > > > > > sorry for you needs what so ever. It's nice not smell your habit on me > > > > > when I �go out to have a nice meal or a few drinks. > > > > > Nah...you stfu....I staid I was up front about my reasons for being > > > > > thrilled with the country going smokeless in public places. That you > > > > > don't like it makes no never mind to me. puff away bozo. Just do it > > > > > out side in the cold away from me and mine. > > > > > > On Mar 14, 4:42 pm, "AmericanBuilt.us" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 14, 7:50 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Your freedoms don't out freedom mine. ;). > > > > > > > i see how you are. your freedom to get what YOU WANT is more > > > important > > > > > > than mine. maybe instead of me standing outside smoking in the > > > cold... > > > > > > you should stop taking your children to eat in a BAR where people > > > > > > DRINK & SMOKE... > > > > > > > you quit because you wanted to and had THE FREEDOM to... > > > > > > > when women or blacks asked for the right to vote, did they demand > > > that > > > > > > it be ILLEGAL for all white men to vote? why can't the OWNER of the > > > > > > bar HAVE THE FREEDOM TO DECIDE if they want to lose 80% of their > > > > > > business ($ to support their family AND the families of ALL their > > > > > > employees) to get "a scumbag looser" like yourself to stop WHINING > > > > > > about what stinks. > > > > > > > ever think that maybe 200+ bar owners who LOST THEIR FAMILY BUSINESS > > > > > > and their 2000+ (now unemployed) employees, might be sitting in a > > > > > > house that is being foreclosed, with children whom they cannot > > > > > > afford > > > > > > to clothe or feed - are thinking to themselves right now, "THIS > > > > > > STINKS!". not to mention the people now competing for lower paying > > > > > > jobs with them. > > > > > > > either find me a SCIENTIFIC report that PROVES 2nd-hand smoke causes > > > > > > cancer - or STFU and stop whining like a crybaby about what stinks - > > > > > > because if you ask me, people who FORCE THEIR will upon others with > > > no > > > > > > care for THEIR feelings or rights: stink... > > > > > -- > > > > Mark M. Kahle, �,www.filacoffee.com-Hidequoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > Mark M. Kahle, �,www.filacoffee.com-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
