I have a history of many family males plus had three sons and one daughter. My second husband was also an only child. We loved but we didn't know how to fight. It was a castastrophe.
On May 18, 3:31�pm, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote: > No one had a choice with me; I was the only child and grandchild > born. �I have no brothers and no male cousins. > > I'm it. > > On May 18, 2:10�pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Boys were favored in an agrarian society and the onus of a dowry. > > Maternal grandfather told the doctor to favor the boy twin but the > > girl lived. I was the last female my father trusted. > > > On May 18, 2:55 pm, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Once again, you are confusing true liberals with the whiny, spineless > > > group who most commonly refer to themselves as democrats. If someone > > > wants to use the word "nigger", he has that right under the first > > > amendment, just like I have the right to tell that same person he is a > > > classless idiot. > > > > As for classifying homosexuals in terms of hate crimes, I think it > > > should be done. There is a huge difference in preaching about > > > homosexuality and going out and beating or killing someone because he > > > or she is gay. To me, that is no different than beating someone > > > because he or she is black, Asian, Hispanic, or in some cases, white. > > > Do I have the right to censor you because you want to refer to someone > > > as a faggot? No. But I still have the right to call you a classless > > > idiot. > > > > (And I mean that in the nicest of ways; I know you are the epitome of > > > class.) > > > > On May 18, 11:23 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey Zeb!! Good to see ya!! > > > > > Holly, I think that the inference, is that there are many, mostly from > > > > your > > > > side of the aisle, who would like to instill these same restrictions > > > > here in > > > > the United States. Just recently, there was the "Matthew Shepard" Act, > > > > which was a little stipulation which would have included Gays in the > > > > "hate > > > > crimes" provision. In essence, what this would have allowed, is the > > > > potential civil or criminal prosecution of every denomination of Church > > > > and > > > > Jewish Synagogue, because of the teachings of the Bible. > > > > > What Zeb was pointing out, is that those who believe themselves to be, > > > > "More > > > > Tolerant, Kinder, Gentler, and More Enlightened"; (e.g.; far left > > > > radical > > > > extremist Moonbats) have no problem bandying about the terms "Nazi" or > > > > "Fascist" when referencing conservatives who hold American principles > > > > and > > > > tenets dear.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
