I bet you would have all been delicious as fritatas

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:50 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I was an only child also- I think I was born to save a marriage- which
> my father wished to return to before he died. But an only child lacks
> skills- how to fight among siblings and later, peers. Plus if you are
> the child of divorced parents in my time you might have well worn the
> letter D. One nun told me in whispered tones outside of the library I
> would have never been admitted to boarding school had the truth been
> known when my parents pretended they were still married. They learned
> it with an obit.
>
> On May 18, 3:31�pm, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote:
> > No one had a choice with me; I was the only child and grandchild
> > born. �I have no brothers and no male cousins.
> >
> > I'm it.
> >
> > On May 18, 2:10�pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Boys were favored in an agrarian society and the onus of a dowry.
> > > Maternal grandfather told the doctor to favor the boy twin but the
> > > girl lived. I was the last female my father trusted.
> >
> > > On May 18, 2:55 pm, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Once again, you are confusing true liberals with the whiny, spineless
> > > > group who most commonly refer to themselves as democrats. If someone
> > > > wants to use the word "nigger", he has that right under the first
> > > > amendment, just like I have the right to tell that same person he is
> a
> > > > classless idiot.
> >
> > > > As for classifying homosexuals in terms of hate crimes, I think it
> > > > should be done. There is a huge difference in preaching about
> > > > homosexuality and going out and beating or killing someone because he
> > > > or she is gay. To me, that is no different than beating someone
> > > > because he or she is black, Asian, Hispanic, or in some cases, white.
> > > > Do I have the right to censor you because you want to refer to
> someone
> > > > as a faggot? No. But I still have the right to call you a classless
> > > > idiot.
> >
> > > > (And I mean that in the nicest of ways; I know you are the epitome of
> > > > class.)
> >
> > > > On May 18, 11:23 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Hey Zeb!! Good to see ya!!
> >
> > > > > Holly, I think that the inference, is that there are many, mostly
> from your
> > > > > side of the aisle, who would like to instill these same
> restrictions here in
> > > > > the United States. Just recently, there was the "Matthew Shepard"
> Act,
> > > > > which was a little stipulation which would have included Gays in
> the "hate
> > > > > crimes" provision. In essence, what this would have allowed, is the
> > > > > potential civil or criminal prosecution of every denomination of
> Church and
> > > > > Jewish Synagogue, because of the teachings of the Bible.
> >
> > > > > What Zeb was pointing out, is that those who believe themselves to
> be, "More
> > > > > Tolerant, Kinder, Gentler, and More Enlightened"; (e.g.; far left
> radical
> > > > > extremist Moonbats) have no problem bandying about the terms "Nazi"
> or
> > > > > "Fascist" when referencing conservatives who hold American
> principles and
> > > > > tenets dear.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to