jgg,

Right, that's what I said. We are a secular nation and not a
theocracy.



On May 19, 8:48 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nor have we been a Secular nation without ties to deep Religious
> roots...   Unlike Europe, we conceive our right are from OUTSIDE of
> men and their governments...  Also we conceive the right of the public
> to overthrow a government if the government is not preforming to
> uphold those rights...
>
> On May 18, 6:03 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > KIT,
>
> > Of course liberals have a secular agenda, so far as our laws go. You
> > say that as if it were a bad thing or something. We are not a
> > theocracy, never have been.
>
> > On May 18, 4:07 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Good Afternoon J.C.!!
>
> > > I agree with you, that there is absolutely no distinction between a 
> > > hateful
> > > act bestowed upon a Gay individual because he is Gay, than there is 
> > > beating
> > > or killing a Black, or Asian, or any other group or ethnicity, because 
> > > they
> > > are a "Woman/Black/Gay/Asian/Hispanic"; etc., etc., etc.
>
> > > The distinction, is that there are already existing laws in all 50 states 
> > > to
> > > punish violent crime, making this proposed Bill, H.R. 1913, *e.g.;* the
> > > "Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act"; and most of the time
> > > referred to as the, "Matthew Shepard Act", unnecessary, unfair, 
> > > indefinable,
> > > un-American and constitutionally suspect.
>
> > > Laws in civilized nations have always been designed to punish conduct, not
> > > thought. H.R. 1913 is not designed to aid in crime fighting. Punishing 
> > > wrong
> > > beliefs about homosexuality is the sole aim of H.R. 1913.
>
> > > H.R. 1913 is one more step in the campaign to legitimize homosexuality in
> > > our culture by treating it as a protected class along with race, gender, 
> > > and
> > > religion. The long term goal is to create one more platform from which to
> > > eradicate wrong thinking about homosexuality. H.R. 1913 will undoubtedly
> > > pave the way to legislation that will make thinking Biblically about
> > > homosexuality a "hate crime."
>
> > > It is the goal of a number of far left extremists with a secularist 
> > > agenda,
> > > and Antii-Christian groups who intend to use "provisions"; (*e.g.;* "loop
> > > holes")  in the proposed legislation to muzzle Churches from speaking out 
> > > on
> > > Biblical standards of morality which are shared by most Americans.
> > > Unnecessary lawsuits will bring a chilling effect to the free speech and
> > > religious liberty of our churches and of our members.
>
> > > By example, the far left militant Gay organizations have outright lied 
> > > about
> > > Matthew Shepard in the first place!  These Gay militant organizations have
> > > portrayed Shepard as being the victim of a hate crime.  That he was 
> > > murdered
> > > because he was Gay, which is simply untrue, yet these gay militant
> > > organizations sill continue to parade such a falsehood, and the far left
> > > extremist media, namely Keith Olberman and MSNBC continue to perpetrate 
> > > the
> > > lie, and literally bash anyone who attempt to reveal the truth about
> > > Shepard's murder!!!
>
> > > Check this out!!
>
> > >http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2009/04/30/abc-debunks-mat...
>
> > > Here is the real story on Matthew Shepard:
>
> > >http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=277685&page=3
>
> > > This J.C., is what is wrong with the left, liberals, progressives, the
> > > Democrat Party, and all that continue to fuel deceit and false hatred!!!
>
> > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM, J.C. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Once again, you are confusing true liberals with the whiny, spineless
> > > > group who most commonly refer to themselves as democrats.  If someone
> > > > wants to use the word "nigger", he has that right under the first
> > > > amendment, just like I have the right to tell that same person he is a
> > > > classless idiot.
>
> > > > As for classifying homosexuals in terms of hate crimes, I think it
> > > > should be done.  There is a huge difference in preaching about
> > > > homosexuality and going out and beating or killing someone because he
> > > > or she is gay.  To me, that is no different than beating someone
> > > > because he or she is black, Asian, Hispanic, or in some cases, white.
> > > > Do I have the right to censor you because you want to refer to someone
> > > > as a faggot?  No.  But I still have the right to call you a classless
> > > > idiot.
>
> > > > (And I mean that in the nicest of ways; I know you are the epitome of
> > > > class.)
>
> > > > On May 18, 11:23 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Hey Zeb!!  Good to see ya!!
>
> > > > > Holly, I think that the inference, is that there are many, mostly from
> > > > your
> > > > > side of the aisle, who would like to instill these same restrictions 
> > > > > here
> > > > in
> > > > > the United States.  Just recently, there was the "Matthew Shepard" 
> > > > > Act,
> > > > > which was a little stipulation which would have included Gays in the
> > > > "hate
> > > > > crimes" provision.  In essence, what this would have allowed, is the
> > > > > potential civil or criminal prosecution of every denomination of 
> > > > > Church
> > > > and
> > > > > Jewish Synagogue, because of the teachings of the Bible.
>
> > > > > What Zeb was pointing out, is that those who believe themselves to be,
> > > > "More
> > > > > Tolerant, Kinder, Gentler, and More Enlightened";  (e.g.; far left
> > > > radical
> > > > > extremist Moonbats)  have no problem bandying about the terms "Nazi" 
> > > > > or
> > > > > "Fascist" when referencing conservatives who hold American principles 
> > > > > and
> > > > > tenets dear.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to