Yer spamming BIG TIME, dude. I told you exactly what Richard did before this. Can't you just stop posting everything you read on the internet on this forum. Like he said, you bury everyone else's posts and KILL ALL DEBATE. Look at the forum, fer Christ's sake. Its all (1 of 1) posts from you and Bruce. I don't even know if I agree with you guys or not. All I know is that I don't have the time or inclination to read the mountain of articles you post to find out.
On Jun 19, 7:24 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > I try to post items that are not from the usual sources such as NYT and > WAPOOP. And a few cartoons as well that need no reply. I space them out > over the day so as to not look like I am spamming which I am not doing. > That is all. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:06 PM, bruce majors <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > actually the only thing that really interests me in this group are dick > > thompson's posted links > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:02 PM, d.b.baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Time to establish a thread limit? For example, if prolific posters > >> want to aggregate/disseminate numerous news stories, it's more > >> advantageous to the group that they be confined to one or two daily > >> threads - as opposed to cluttering the board with numerous threads > >> (topics). Especially when the same news topics are widely available on > >> the net. > > >> I try to follow this approach myself, especially when posting quotes/ > >> links to/in a related topic. This doesn't guarantee "discussion" of > >> the specific subject per se, but it does acknowledge and respect the > >> fact that other members may not share a similar interest. > > >> It's also helpful to the group when we revive dormant threads to re- > >> address specific subject matter that's already posted, especially if > >> the thread generated a discussion (i.e., interest). > > >> In the end, it's a lot easier to scan a single topic/header than to go > >> back and forth between numerous threads. > > >> If you agree, we could to do this as a [voluntary] courtesy. > > -- > *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
