Mark, I'm afraid Bruce is not acting.
On Jul 6, 4:50 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Bruce, > > One example... the lies Bush told (and there is NO doubt that he did so, > ((senate intelligence report 2006)) ) to put the US into Iraq was > consistently compared to Clintons testimony about consensual sex. > > Quit acting the idiot. Bushites trying to say Clinton left the US in debt > and not one "red" cent was Bushs' fault. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:25 PM, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > sorry hollyfool > > I don't know who the we is who you think defended Bush > > > and I don't know many Bush supporters who spent a lot of time trying to > > justify him by referring to Clinton > > > maybe you can do your homework and find some examples > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Hollywood > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> bruce, > > >> Why not/ You lads defended Bush for years by saying "But Bill > >> Clinton.............". > > >> On Jul 6, 1:23 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > why do obamanoids think that saying Bush did something is a defense of > >> > Odumba > > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:55 PM, dick thompson <[email protected] > >> >wrote: > > >> > > How is this like what Bush did. Bush did not implement a treaty > >> without > >> > > the approval of the Senate first. That is what Obama is trying to do. > >> > > Suppose he implements it and the Senate votes it down. Then what > >> happens. > > >> > > Frederick The Moderate wrote: > > >> > > It seems the Dems are now doing exactly what Bush did - except it's > >> > > the GOP who's compaining this time. Now if Obama starts telling us how > >> > > "We absolutely must do this right away or they will blow us all up > >> > > with WMDs!", he will have completed his journey to the Dark Side of > >> > > the Force. > > >> > > I don't like the smell of it but will wait to see if they actually try > >> > > it, before getting to rattled... > > >> > > On Jul 6, 9:14 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > Sounds right to me. I don't see where the president can just make > >> the > >> > > treaty without the consent of the US Senate. If I remember right it > >> > > takes both of them to approve the treaties. It is not really a done > >> > > deal if the president signs it unless the senate also approves it. > >> > > Guess they forgot that one. Of course they also tried to forget that > >> > > when it came to Kyoto for a while as the Dems tried to force the US to > >> > > implement a treaty that the Senate never ratified. Looks like another > >> > > one coming along. > > >> > > *The Constitution Imposes Severe Limits On A President's Treaty-Making > >> > > Powers: * Here's the relevant section< > >>http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_Am...> > >> <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_Am.. > >> .>: > > >> > > He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the > >> > > Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators > >> > > present concur; > > >> > > The Obama administration is finding that limitation inconvenient< > >>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/05/obama-hey-lets-bypass-the-senat...> > >> <http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/05/obama-hey-lets-bypass-the-senat.. > >> .>, > >> > > and so they are thinking of "temporarily bypassing"< > >>http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/07/us-russian-arms-negot...> > >> <http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/07/us-russian-arms-negot.. > >> .> > >> > > the Senate. Not on any important matter, just a little agreement > >> with > >> > > the Russians on limiting nuclear arms. > > >> > > I looked carefully through the Constitution, and could not find any > >> > > provision that allows a president to bypass, temporarily or otherwise, > >> > > that limit on his treaty-making powers. > > >> > > Senator Byrd --- among others --- isn't going to like this one little > >> bit. > >> > > - 8:08 AM, 6 July 2009 [link]< > >>http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2009_1.html#jrm7578<http://www.seanet.com/~jimxc/Politics/July2009_1.html#jrm7578>> > >> <http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2009_1.html#jrm7578<http://www.seanet.com/~jimxc/Politics/July2009_1.html#jrm7578>>- > >> Hide quoted text - > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > -- > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
