Sage2, I REPEAT, I don't care WHO he was posting his remarks to. I confronted the statement bruce said. Don't give a shit what you claim I was REALLY doing. Don't you get that?
Nothing whatsoever obligates me to give bruce the authority to decide just what is "meaningful" and what is not. Or you for that matter. On Jul 12, 5:33 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > Holly, > > Then you are unwilling to accept in what context > he made the comment. Typical socialist Saul Alinsky play, right out of > the playbook. For yours and Freddy's information, it was a response to > an analogy I gave Bruce in respect to " illegal immigration". Had > nothing to do with Keith but you used it as an opportunity to 'stop > and spin' DEMOCRAT style using it as a tool to confront Keith. I > suggest you go back and review the thread completely. > > ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > On Jul 12, 5:46 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sage2, > > > What do I care WHO bruce was directing his comment towards? How would > > that change my post is an "meaningful" way? > > I was adressing the comment, don't much care who it was directed > > towards. > > > On Jul 12, 4:22 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Holly Lad, > > > > You need to pay attention! Bruce was responding to me > > > ( Sage2 ) not Keith . You are right Keith the man needs to properly > > > read and comprehend the posts. > > > > ***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > On Jul 12, 2:49 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > bruce, > > > > > What did KIT say that was NOT meaningful? Do you wish to refute and/or > > > > debate any of the points KIT made? Do you question the accuracy of any > > > > of the information he submitted? > > > > > That's a cute little trick lad. Simply declare someone/something as > > > > "lacking in credibility" or "not meaningful" or some other bullshit > > > > and you don't have to address the statement or deal with it. > > > > > On Jul 12, 10:50 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > don't descend to Holly's level > > > > > say something meaningful > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Bruce, > > > > > > > Bruce, > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 10:55 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Banks actually offer accounts to illegal aliens, but do not > > > > > > > welcome in > > > > > > > violent criminals > > > > > > > The analogy below fails > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************* > > > > > > ** I can have an account at any bank and still choose to rob > > > > > > it. > > > > > > Illegals choose to steal, lie & cheat there way in over other honest > > > > > > immigrants coming in legally ! Analogy stands ! > > > > > > > ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > > > If I have a farm and invite "illegal" "aliens" to work on it that > > > > > > > isn't > > > > > > > immoral and the government that attempts to prevent this > > > > > > > consensual > > > > > > > nonviolent act is violating our rights > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************** > > > > > > > > ** It may not be a violent criminal act to enter the country " > > > > > > illegally " but it is " ILLEGAL " and you as farmer Bruce are > > > > > > aiding and > > > > > > abetting said non-violent yet " Illegal " crime. Comprehension of > > > > > > words and > > > > > > their meanings go a long way. LEGAL/ILLEGAL > > > > > > > ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Sage2 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Lets put it at your level of comprehension LAD! > > > > > > > > People all know there is money in the banks to be had and if > > > > > > > > they rob > > > > > > > > it they will be better off economically. However; banks do not > > > > > > > > invite > > > > > > > > people in to rob them only to come in and conduct business > > > > > > > > legally. It > > > > > > > > is the " illegal aliens" who steal, lie & cheat their way in > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > country with their own legs & own will. Now if they come in " > > > > > > > > legally > > > > > > > > " like other immigrants do than there is no problem because > > > > > > > > they did > > > > > > > > not come into the country " illegally ". The problem on this > > > > > > > > thread > > > > > > > > is that some are able to differentiate between " legal " and " > > > > > > > > illegal " and others like you, enablers, cohorts, etc; are not > > > > > > > > able to > > > > > > > > do so. There is ideology and then there is reality; reality > > > > > > > > trumps > > > > > > > > ideology every time. The reality being that there are millions > > > > > > > > of " > > > > > > > > illegal immigrants " who are causing unjust burdens on other > > > > > > > > citizens > > > > > > > > in this country to which the rest of us have to pay for. They > > > > > > > > are in > > > > > > > > affect robbing the bank and are assisted by said enablers, > > > > > > > > cohorts,ie., ACLU. LaRatza, congress, sanctuary cities.....et > > > > > > > > al . > > > > > > > > Everyone knows that you take care of your legal business at the > > > > > > > > bank > > > > > > > > and then you get the hell out. No rational bank manager will > > > > > > > > let you > > > > > > > > set up camp . > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 11:36 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sage2, > > > > > > > ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* > > > > > > > > > > Please expalin where I said "only business"? Why is there > > > > > > > > > such a > > > > > > > > > frantic attempt to deflect any sort of responsibility for this > > > > > > problem > > > > > > > > > from "business"? Why the attempt to talk about any one EXCEPT > > > > > > > > > business? If you wish to claim I want to talk about only > > > > > > > > > business > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > would be irrational about my claiming you wish to talk about > > > > > > > > > anyone > > > > > > > > > EXCEPT "business"? > > > > > > > > > > Why are not businesses that attract , hire and protect > > > > > > > > > illegals also > > > > > > > > > described as "maggots"? Tell you what, you include American > > > > > > > > > corporations in that list of "enabling maggots" and I will > > > > > > > > > agree with > > > > > > > > > you. But you won't, will you? > > > > > > > > > Tell me where i attempted to defend any of those > > > > > > > > > organizations you > > > > > > > > > mentioned, concerning the illegal alien issue. > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 10:03 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > > Your attempt was to put the problem of > > > > > > > > > > "enabling" > > > > > > > > > > illegal immigration only @ businesses , but you failed to > > > > > > > > > > mention > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > other enablers in government most of whom are Democrats. > > > > > > > > > > How about > > > > > > > > > > the ACLU (American Communist Lawyers Union ), LaRatza ( I > > > > > > > > > > smell a > > > > > > > > > > ratz ) , the sanctuary cities like San Fransisco, New Haven > > > > > > > > > > and all > > > > > > > > > > the other maggot enablers who think that Mexican Alien > > > > > > > > > > Immigrants > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > their likes have a right to perpetrate crimes and cheat, > > > > > > > > > > steal & > > > > > > lie > > > > > > > > > > their way in over other immigrants trying to get in legally. > > > > > > Another > > > > > > > > > > great attempt at stop & spin though LAD ! > > > > > > > ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 10:24 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Sage2, > > > > > > > > > > > > You are correct of course. I assume that the companies > > > > > > > > > > > that hire > > > > > > them > > > > > > > > > > > must of course be listed as among the cohorts and > > > > > > > > > > > defenders of > > > > > > > > illegal > > > > > > > > > > > aliens. Correct? Are you familiar with the term > > > > > > > > > > > "enabling"? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry lad, I do not own a Urban Dictionary. I assume you > > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > objection to the terms "illegal alieb" and/or illegal > > > > > > immigration"? > > > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > > > > so, tough shit, you know full well what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 8:05 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not only are the " illegal > > > > > > > > > > > > aliens " > > > > > > guilty > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > " illegal immigration " but they and their cohorts & > > > > > > > > > > > > defenders > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > also guilty of insolence. They have no respect for the > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > injustice > > > > > > > > > > > > they perpetrate against all Americans and all the hard > > > > > > > > > > > > working > > > > > > > > > > > > immigrants who come to make their new life in this > > > > > > > > > > > > country > > > > > > legally. > > > > > > > > Of > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
