Sage2, What do I care WHO bruce was directing his comment towards? How would that change my post is an "meaningful" way? I was adressing the comment, don't much care who it was directed towards.
On Jul 12, 4:22 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > Holly Lad, > > You need to pay attention! Bruce was responding to me > ( Sage2 ) not Keith . You are right Keith the man needs to properly > read and comprehend the posts. > > ***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > On Jul 12, 2:49 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > bruce, > > > What did KIT say that was NOT meaningful? Do you wish to refute and/or > > debate any of the points KIT made? Do you question the accuracy of any > > of the information he submitted? > > > That's a cute little trick lad. Simply declare someone/something as > > "lacking in credibility" or "not meaningful" or some other bullshit > > and you don't have to address the statement or deal with it. > > > On Jul 12, 10:50 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > don't descend to Holly's level > > > say something meaningful > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Bruce, > > > > > Bruce, > > > > > On Jul 12, 10:55 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Banks actually offer accounts to illegal aliens, but do not welcome in > > > > > violent criminals > > > > > The analogy below fails > > > > > ************************************************************************************* > > > > ** I can have an account at any bank and still choose to rob it. > > > > Illegals choose to steal, lie & cheat there way in over other honest > > > > immigrants coming in legally ! Analogy stands ! > > > > > ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > If I have a farm and invite "illegal" "aliens" to work on it that > > > > > isn't > > > > > immoral and the government that attempts to prevent this consensual > > > > > nonviolent act is violating our rights > > > > > ************************************************************************************** > > > > > > ** It may not be a violent criminal act to enter the country " > > > > illegally " but it is " ILLEGAL " and you as farmer Bruce are aiding and > > > > abetting said non-violent yet " Illegal " crime. Comprehension of words > > > > and > > > > their meanings go a long way. LEGAL/ILLEGAL > > > > > ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Lets put it at your level of comprehension LAD! > > > > > > People all know there is money in the banks to be had and if they > > > > > > rob > > > > > > it they will be better off economically. However; banks do not > > > > > > invite > > > > > > people in to rob them only to come in and conduct business legally. > > > > > > It > > > > > > is the " illegal aliens" who steal, lie & cheat their way in this > > > > > > country with their own legs & own will. Now if they come in " > > > > > > legally > > > > > > " like other immigrants do than there is no problem because they did > > > > > > not come into the country " illegally ". The problem on this thread > > > > > > is that some are able to differentiate between " legal " and " > > > > > > illegal " and others like you, enablers, cohorts, etc; are not able > > > > > > to > > > > > > do so. There is ideology and then there is reality; reality trumps > > > > > > ideology every time. The reality being that there are millions of " > > > > > > illegal immigrants " who are causing unjust burdens on other > > > > > > citizens > > > > > > in this country to which the rest of us have to pay for. They are in > > > > > > affect robbing the bank and are assisted by said enablers, > > > > > > cohorts,ie., ACLU. LaRatza, congress, sanctuary cities.....et al . > > > > > > Everyone knows that you take care of your legal business at the bank > > > > > > and then you get the hell out. No rational bank manager will let you > > > > > > set up camp . > > > > > ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 11:36 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Sage2, > > > > > ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* > > > > > > > > Please expalin where I said "only business"? Why is there such a > > > > > > > frantic attempt to deflect any sort of responsibility for this > > > > problem > > > > > > > from "business"? Why the attempt to talk about any one EXCEPT > > > > > > > business? If you wish to claim I want to talk about only business > > > > what > > > > > > > would be irrational about my claiming you wish to talk about > > > > > > > anyone > > > > > > > EXCEPT "business"? > > > > > > > > Why are not businesses that attract , hire and protect illegals > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > described as "maggots"? Tell you what, you include American > > > > > > > corporations in that list of "enabling maggots" and I will agree > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > you. But you won't, will you? > > > > > > > Tell me where i attempted to defend any of those organizations you > > > > > > > mentioned, concerning the illegal alien issue. > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 10:03 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > Your attempt was to put the problem of > > > > > > > > "enabling" > > > > > > > > illegal immigration only @ businesses , but you failed to > > > > > > > > mention > > > > the > > > > > > > > other enablers in government most of whom are Democrats. How > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > the ACLU (American Communist Lawyers Union ), LaRatza ( I smell > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > ratz ) , the sanctuary cities like San Fransisco, New Haven and > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > the other maggot enablers who think that Mexican Alien > > > > > > > > Immigrants > > > > and > > > > > > > > their likes have a right to perpetrate crimes and cheat, steal & > > > > lie > > > > > > > > their way in over other immigrants trying to get in legally. > > > > Another > > > > > > > > great attempt at stop & spin though LAD ! > > > > > ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 10:24 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sage2, > > > > > > > > > > You are correct of course. I assume that the companies that > > > > > > > > > hire > > > > them > > > > > > > > > must of course be listed as among the cohorts and defenders of > > > > > > illegal > > > > > > > > > aliens. Correct? Are you familiar with the term "enabling"? > > > > > > > > > > Sorry lad, I do not own a Urban Dictionary. I assume you have > > > > some > > > > > > > > > objection to the terms "illegal alieb" and/or illegal > > > > immigration"? > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > > so, tough shit, you know full well what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 8:05 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Not only are the " illegal aliens " > > > > guilty > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > " illegal immigration " but they and their cohorts & > > > > > > > > > > defenders > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > also guilty of insolence. They have no respect for the the > > > > > > injustice > > > > > > > > > > they perpetrate against all Americans and all the hard > > > > > > > > > > working > > > > > > > > > > immigrants who come to make their new life in this country > > > > legally. > > > > > > Of > > > > > > > > > > course they do not acknowledge the injustice because they > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > unable > > > > > > > > > > to comprehend the definitions of either the words legal or > > > > illegal. > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > much reliance on the URBAN DICTIONARY. Right Holly ?? > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 11:19 am, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The larger problem are those aiding > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > abetting > > > > > > > > > > > both businesses & the " illegals ",ie; sanctuary cities, > > > > > > government > > > > > > > > > > > officials, churches,ACLU, LaRatza, and all the other > > > > > > > > > > > cronies > > > > that > > > > > > bend > > > > > > > > > > > over to in effect gain both cheap labor, and cheap votes. > > > > These > > > > > > > > > > > people are stealing, cheating, and undermining those who > > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > and/or > > > > > > > > > > > are trying to obtain citizenship legally. Those who > > > > > > > > > > > support > > > > ' > > > > > > Illegal > > > > > > > > > > > immigration " are to feeble minded to understand what the > > > > > > definition > > > > > > > > > > > of " illegal " is and have no problem in wasting our TAX > > > > DOLLARS > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > those who break the immigration laws. For the socialist > > > > democrats > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > works well because an uneducated mass coming over the > > > > > > > > > > > borders > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > easier to control especially if you throw them in with the > > > > > > uneducated > > > > > > > > > > > masses in our urban cities. California is now suffering > > > > because > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > such policies! The rest of the country will also feel > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
