Cold, Let ME take a wild guess here. You have never served in the U.S. military and know even less about agent orange than you do the military or Vietnam. How's that for a guess? How close am I? Please tell me what is reasonable about your assumption.
On Jul 13, 12:09 pm, Cold Water <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be reasonable to assume you are living off of government money > (some sort of Agent Orange-like scam). If this is the case, I want you to > get your fat ass away from the computer Marine and go out and try to make a > difference. You accomplish little to nothing here. > > CW ;-)) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hollywood" <[email protected]> > To: "PoliticalForum" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:57 > Subject: Re: LA Times: The Cost of Illegal Aliens > > Zeb, > > It sure does, speculate all you wish. > One normally ends up in the truck of a car parked in an alley with an > ice-pick handle growing out of his ear for doing something like that. > Of course there IS the witness protection program I hear. Good > imagination Zeb ol' boy. > > On Jul 13, 11:51 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE that story. > > > Hmmm...I guess that leaves us to speculate. Lets see....Holly was a > > mid level distributor of pot operating out of Florida. He makes tons > > of money and launders it into legal businesses but gets busted. The > > Feds, however, aren't really interested in taking Holly down, they > > want the guys above him. Holly gets a good lawyer and the deal is, he > > gives up his sources, gets out of the business and , here's the good > > part, gets to keep his ill gotten gains. > > > Close? > > > On Jul 13, 12:32 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > KIT, > > > > Sorry you have to work so hard, sounds like you have been putting in a > > > lot of time. > > > I know YOUR joking, but there are morons around here that take such > > > statements to heart. It would tickle you to death to know just how I > > > made the money that enabled me to retire at age 53 in a position where > > > I will not have to worry about money unless I live past the age of 99. > > > But I'll never tell. Really, I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE that > > > story. But it's a great one! > > > > On Jul 12, 10:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I am literally laughing out loud Holly!!! > > > > > Sometimes....You do really tickle me!!! > > > > > Some of us have jobs buddy!!! We all can't go around driving > > > > dilapidated > > > > school buses, toting illegal aliens to the polls now can we? (LOL! > > > > That > > > > was a joke Holly!!) > > > > > In this case, I have been giving literally over a 100 hours a week, > > > > for the > > > > last couple......This week looks to be another ball buster! > > > > Nevertheless, I > > > > will make time to check in on you, FreddieJack, and Young Bruce!! > > > > > Have a great week! > > > > > Keith > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Hollywood > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > Why, I wait in breathless anticipation to read your every golden > > > > > word. :-) > > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:47 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > It's nice to know that I am missed Holly......I haven't been > > > > > > active on > > > > > the > > > > > > board, other than this weekend, in almost two weeks. Glad to see > > > > > > that > > > > > you > > > > > > noticed..... > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Hollywood > > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > Huh? You've been MIA for a couple of weeks? I spoke to you on > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > thread maybe 6 or 7 hours ago. Do you mean MIA in your capacity > > > > > > > as a > > > > > > > moderator, but not as a posting member? Have I been talking to > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > Keith In Tampa????? > > > > > > > Heck, you posted in this thread today. What gives? > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:32 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Fred, Bruce, Holly, Richard, and all Group Members, > > > > > > > > > I sincerely apologize, to Mark, to Mystery Moderater No. 1, > > > > > > > (affectionately > > > > > > > > called, "Newie" even though (s)he's been around the block a > > > > > > > > few > > > > > times) > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > most importantly, to the Group as a whole. I was missing in > > > > > > > > action > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, my schedule was rather hectic, (No.....I was > > > > > slammed!!) > > > > > > > > and I literally had no time for moderation, much less trying > > > > > > > > to turn > > > > > the > > > > > > > > light bulb on for Fred/Jack, Sean "SugarShack" Virtual Truth, > > > > > > > > Studio, > > > > > > > > Fritzie, Bill, Biffie, Golem, and all of our friends over at > > > > > Euwetopia. > > > > > > > > > In a nutshell, Bruce's comments were out of line, as were > > > > > > > > several > > > > > other > > > > > > > > members. I don't know who started it; I point Bruce out, > > > > > > > > because it > > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > > as though you Fred, are inferring that Young Bruce is getting > > > > > > > > some > > > > > kind > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > special treatment, and that is incorrect. The bottom line is, > > > > > > > > we > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > allow for the nasty, vile personal attacks against another > > > > > > > > Group > > > > > Member, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > I salute Mark for trying to keep a lid on it! > > > > > > > > > We have only one rule here in PoliticalForum: "Govern Yourself > > > > > > > > With > > > > > > > > Dignity, and be respectful of each and every other Member". > > > > > > > > You can > > > > > > > find > > > > > > > > this rule, and our guidelines here: > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum/web/political-forum-dec... > > > > > > > > > For the most part, all of us here have known one another for > > > > > > > > years. > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > the proverbial "Newbie", being only a member since April of > > > > > > > > last > > > > > year. > > > > > > > > Everyone seems to get along, and there is no reason for > > > > > > > > slinging > > > > > hateful, > > > > > > > > nasty barbs and insulting commentary. > > > > > > > > > There is a distinction between debate, I dare say even heated > > > > > > > > debate, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > just downright offensive name calling and insult slinging. We > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > do > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > here, and if that is the only way that you can express > > > > > > > > yourself, then > > > > > I > > > > > > > > strongly suggest that you find another political discussion > > > > > > > > board. > > > > > It > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > don't work here. > > > > > > > > > The rule goes for everyone, from any political persuasion, and > > > > > > > > there > > > > > are > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > exceptions. > > > > > > > > > If someone got their feelings hurt by something said here > > > > > > > > during the > > > > > last > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, then I take full responsibility. Again, I > > > > > > > > apologize > > > > > for > > > > > > > > not being around like I was supposed to be. I have corrected > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > There is also a distinction between using colorful metaphors, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > slinging > > > > > > > > insulting "nasties" at another member, and we all know what I > > > > > > > > am > > > > > talking > > > > > > > > about. By example, Holly on occasion and from time to time > > > > > > > > uses > > > > > the, > > > > > > > > "Colorful Metaphors".....Holly is not being insulting when he > > > > > > > > uses > > > > > such > > > > > > > > language, Holly has been doing this ever since I have been a > > > > > > > > member > > > > > of > > > > > > > PF, > > > > > > > > and I have no problem with it....As stated, that is the way > > > > > > > > that he > > > > > > > > expresses himself, and his comments are not directed at any > > > > > > > > one > > > > > member to > > > > > > > > insult them. Those of you who seem to want to analogize > > > > > > > > another > > > > > Member > > > > > > > > with a part of either the male, or female anatomy, and/or make > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > comparison > > > > > > > > to a Member with human, or any other animal species' body > > > > > > > > waste, > > > > > again, > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > is unacceptable. > > > > > > > > > Again, I apologize for my absence. I respectfully ask that > > > > > > > > everyone > > > > > be > > > > > > > > respectful of each and every other member, and if there is a > > > > > question, > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > if there is anything in this message that you don't > > > > > > > > understand, then > > > > > by > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > means, please feel free to contact me by e-mail. > > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > > KeithInTampa > > > > > > > > Co-Moderator > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well Keith, nice to write but I don't believe you. Virtually > > > > > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > reply Bruce writes has his puerile little references to > > > > > > > > > dicks, shit > > > > > > > > > etc... Now suddenly you are concerned that anyone does it? > > > > > > > > > You're > > > > > > > > > lying and the proof will come as soon as Bruce writes his > > > > > > > > > next few > > > > > > > > > replies and lo what do you know - he remains in the group > > > > > > > > > anyway > > > > > > > > > because as the pigs put it "some are more equal than > > > > > > > > > others". > > > > > > > > > Look I don't care. I don't bother reading his replies etc... > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > it's all the same pattern: 1. Find something to criticize 2. > > > > > Disagree > > > > > > > > > with any point made by those have have kicked his ass in > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > discussions (poor little guy definitely holds onto anger ;). > > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > When > > > > > > > > > he starts getting his ass kicked > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
