KIT, Why would ACORN pay me for doing something I would happily do for FREE? If for no other reason that to piss off guys like yourself? Not logical at all. So far Zeb is doing the best with the "retired drug dealer theory". C'mon people, show a little imagination and panache! A little class if you will.
On Jul 13, 12:25 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > How about this one: > > ACORN pays Holly a weekly stipend to drive around East St. Louis, in an old > dilapidated school bus, picking up transients, illegal aliens, fat Black > women who smell like collards and Avon, and a host of other lower > socio-economic folks, and totes them to their designated government agency > for their daily/weekly/monthly stipend. > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey, I gave it a shot. I had some tight parameters to work with. Only > > 53. Enough money to live on till 99. Not allowed to talk about it. > > > How about this one: > > > Holly was a car salesman working in a Mercedes dealership, where he > > meets and strikes up a "relationship" with a woman much older than > > himself and with some public image. He cons her into thinking he loves > > her and they marry, whereupon Holly begins a string of dalliances with > > younger attractive women. His "wife" is outraged and in the divorce > > agreement, she sets him up for life under the condition that he makes > > no disclosures, public or private about their marriage or the > > conditions of its dissolution. > > > On Jul 13, 12:57 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Zeb, > > > > It sure does, speculate all you wish. > > > One normally ends up in the truck of a car parked in an alley with an > > > ice-pick handle growing out of his ear for doing something like that. > > > Of course there IS the witness protection program I hear. Good > > > imagination Zeb ol' boy. > > > > On Jul 13, 11:51 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE that story. > > > > > Hmmm...I guess that leaves us to speculate. Lets see....Holly was a > > > > mid level distributor of pot operating out of Florida. He makes tons > > > > of money and launders it into legal businesses but gets busted. The > > > > Feds, however, aren't really interested in taking Holly down, they > > > > want the guys above him. Holly gets a good lawyer and the deal is, he > > > > gives up his sources, gets out of the business and , here's the good > > > > part, gets to keep his ill gotten gains. > > > > > Close? > > > > > On Jul 13, 12:32 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > Sorry you have to work so hard, sounds like you have been putting in > > a > > > > > lot of time. > > > > > I know YOUR joking, but there are morons around here that take such > > > > > statements to heart. It would tickle you to death to know just how I > > > > > made the money that enabled me to retire at age 53 in a position > > where > > > > > I will not have to worry about money unless I live past the age of > > 99. > > > > > But I'll never tell. Really, I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE > > that > > > > > story. But it's a great one! > > > > > > On Jul 12, 10:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I am literally laughing out loud Holly!!! > > > > > > > Sometimes....You do really tickle me!!! > > > > > > > Some of us have jobs buddy!!! We all can't go around driving > > dilapidated > > > > > > school buses, toting illegal aliens to the polls now can we? (LOL! > > That > > > > > > was a joke Holly!!) > > > > > > > In this case, I have been giving literally over a 100 hours a week, > > for the > > > > > > last couple......This week looks to be another ball buster! > > Nevertheless, I > > > > > > will make time to check in on you, FreddieJack, and Young Bruce!! > > > > > > > Have a great week! > > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Hollywood < > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > Why, I wait in breathless anticipation to read your every golden > > > > > > > word. :-) > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:47 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > It's nice to know that I am missed Holly......I haven't been > > active on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > board, other than this weekend, in almost two weeks. Glad to > > see that > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > noticed..... > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Hollywood < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > Huh? You've been MIA for a couple of weeks? I spoke to you on > > another > > > > > > > > > thread maybe 6 or 7 hours ago. Do you mean MIA in your > > capacity as a > > > > > > > > > moderator, but not as a posting member? Have I been talking > > to another > > > > > > > > > Keith In Tampa????? > > > > > > > > > Heck, you posted in this thread today. What gives? > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:32 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Fred, Bruce, Holly, Richard, and all Group Members, > > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely apologize, to Mark, to Mystery Moderater No. 1, > > > > > > > > > (affectionately > > > > > > > > > > called, "Newie" even though (s)he's been around the block a > > few > > > > > > > times) > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > most importantly, to the Group as a whole. I was missing > > in action > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, my schedule was rather hectic, (No.....I > > was > > > > > > > slammed!!) > > > > > > > > > > and I literally had no time for moderation, much less > > trying to turn > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > light bulb on for Fred/Jack, Sean "SugarShack" Virtual > > Truth, Studio, > > > > > > > > > > Fritzie, Bill, Biffie, Golem, and all of our friends over > > at > > > > > > > Euwetopia. > > > > > > > > > > > In a nutshell, Bruce's comments were out of line, as were > > several > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > > members. I don't know who started it; I point Bruce out, > > because it > > > > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > > > > as though you Fred, are inferring that Young Bruce is > > getting some > > > > > > > kind > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > special treatment, and that is incorrect. The bottom line > > is, we > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > allow for the nasty, vile personal attacks against another > > Group > > > > > > > Member, > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > I salute Mark for trying to keep a lid on it! > > > > > > > > > > > We have only one rule here in PoliticalForum: "Govern > > Yourself With > > > > > > > > > > Dignity, and be respectful of each and every other Member". > > You can > > > > > > > > > find > > > > > > > > > > this rule, and our guidelines here: > > >http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum/web/political-forum-dec... > > > > > > > > > > > For the most part, all of us here have known one another > > for years. > > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > > the proverbial "Newbie", being only a member since April of > > last > > > > > > > year. > > > > > > > > > > Everyone seems to get along, and there is no reason for > > slinging > > > > > > > hateful, > > > > > > > > > > nasty barbs and insulting commentary. > > > > > > > > > > > There is a distinction between debate, I dare say even > > heated debate, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > just downright offensive name calling and insult slinging. > > We don't > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > here, and if that is the only way that you can express > > yourself, then > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > strongly suggest that you find another political discussion > > board. > > > > > > > It > > > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > > don't work here. > > > > > > > > > > > The rule goes for everyone, from any political persuasion, > > and there > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > exceptions. > > > > > > > > > > > If someone got their feelings hurt by something said here > > during the > > > > > > > last > > > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, then I take full responsibility. Again, I > > apologize > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > not being around like I was supposed to be. I have > > corrected that > > > > > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > > > There is also a distinction between using colorful > > metaphors, and > > > > > > > > > slinging > > > > > > > > > > insulting "nasties" at another member, and we all know what > > I am > > > > > > > talking > > > > > > > > > > about. By example, Holly on occasion and from time to > > time uses > > > > > > > the, > > > > > > > > > > "Colorful Metaphors".....Holly is not being insulting when > > he uses > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > language, Holly has been doing this ever since I have been > > a member > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > PF, > > > > > > > > > > and I have no problem with it....As stated, that is the way > > that he > > > > > > > > > > expresses himself, and his comments are not directed at any > > one > > > > > > > member to > > > > > > > > > > insult them. Those of you who seem to want to analogize > > another > > > > > > > Member > > > > > > > > > > with a part of either the male, or female anatomy, and/or > > make a > > > > > > > > > comparison > > > > > > > > > > to a Member with human, or any other animal species' body > > waste, > > > > > > > again, > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > is unacceptable. > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I apologize for my absence. I respectfully ask > > that everyone > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > respectful of each and every other member, and if there is > > a > > > > > > > question, > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > if there is anything in this message that you don't > > understand, then > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > means, please feel free to contact me by e-mail. > > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > > > > KeithInTampa > > > > > > > > > > Co-Moderator > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Keith, nice to write but I don't believe you. > > Virtually every > > > > > > > > > > > reply Bruce writes has his puerile little references > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
