How about this one: ACORN pays Holly a weekly stipend to drive around East St. Louis, in an old dilapidated school bus, picking up transients, illegal aliens, fat Black women who smell like collards and Avon, and a host of other lower socio-economic folks, and totes them to their designated government agency for their daily/weekly/monthly stipend.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey, I gave it a shot. I had some tight parameters to work with. Only > 53. Enough money to live on till 99. Not allowed to talk about it. > > How about this one: > > Holly was a car salesman working in a Mercedes dealership, where he > meets and strikes up a "relationship" with a woman much older than > himself and with some public image. He cons her into thinking he loves > her and they marry, whereupon Holly begins a string of dalliances with > younger attractive women. His "wife" is outraged and in the divorce > agreement, she sets him up for life under the condition that he makes > no disclosures, public or private about their marriage or the > conditions of its dissolution. > > On Jul 13, 12:57 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > Zeb, > > > > It sure does, speculate all you wish. > > One normally ends up in the truck of a car parked in an alley with an > > ice-pick handle growing out of his ear for doing something like that. > > Of course there IS the witness protection program I hear. Good > > imagination Zeb ol' boy. > > > > On Jul 13, 11:51 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE that story. > > > > > Hmmm...I guess that leaves us to speculate. Lets see....Holly was a > > > mid level distributor of pot operating out of Florida. He makes tons > > > of money and launders it into legal businesses but gets busted. The > > > Feds, however, aren't really interested in taking Holly down, they > > > want the guys above him. Holly gets a good lawyer and the deal is, he > > > gives up his sources, gets out of the business and , here's the good > > > part, gets to keep his ill gotten gains. > > > > > Close? > > > > > On Jul 13, 12:32 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > Sorry you have to work so hard, sounds like you have been putting in > a > > > > lot of time. > > > > I know YOUR joking, but there are morons around here that take such > > > > statements to heart. It would tickle you to death to know just how I > > > > made the money that enabled me to retire at age 53 in a position > where > > > > I will not have to worry about money unless I live past the age of > 99. > > > > But I'll never tell. Really, I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE > that > > > > story. But it's a great one! > > > > > > On Jul 12, 10:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I am literally laughing out loud Holly!!! > > > > > > > Sometimes....You do really tickle me!!! > > > > > > > Some of us have jobs buddy!!! We all can't go around driving > dilapidated > > > > > school buses, toting illegal aliens to the polls now can we? (LOL! > That > > > > > was a joke Holly!!) > > > > > > > In this case, I have been giving literally over a 100 hours a week, > for the > > > > > last couple......This week looks to be another ball buster! > Nevertheless, I > > > > > will make time to check in on you, FreddieJack, and Young Bruce!! > > > > > > > Have a great week! > > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Hollywood < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > Why, I wait in breathless anticipation to read your every golden > > > > > > word. :-) > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:47 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > It's nice to know that I am missed Holly......I haven't been > active on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > board, other than this weekend, in almost two weeks. Glad to > see that > > > > > > you > > > > > > > noticed..... > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Hollywood < > [email protected] > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > Huh? You've been MIA for a couple of weeks? I spoke to you on > another > > > > > > > > thread maybe 6 or 7 hours ago. Do you mean MIA in your > capacity as a > > > > > > > > moderator, but not as a posting member? Have I been talking > to another > > > > > > > > Keith In Tampa????? > > > > > > > > Heck, you posted in this thread today. What gives? > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:32 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Fred, Bruce, Holly, Richard, and all Group Members, > > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely apologize, to Mark, to Mystery Moderater No. 1, > > > > > > > > (affectionately > > > > > > > > > called, "Newie" even though (s)he's been around the block a > few > > > > > > times) > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > most importantly, to the Group as a whole. I was missing > in action > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, my schedule was rather hectic, (No.....I > was > > > > > > slammed!!) > > > > > > > > > and I literally had no time for moderation, much less > trying to turn > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > light bulb on for Fred/Jack, Sean "SugarShack" Virtual > Truth, Studio, > > > > > > > > > Fritzie, Bill, Biffie, Golem, and all of our friends over > at > > > > > > Euwetopia. > > > > > > > > > > > In a nutshell, Bruce's comments were out of line, as were > several > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > members. I don't know who started it; I point Bruce out, > because it > > > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > > > as though you Fred, are inferring that Young Bruce is > getting some > > > > > > kind > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > special treatment, and that is incorrect. The bottom line > is, we > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > allow for the nasty, vile personal attacks against another > Group > > > > > > Member, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > I salute Mark for trying to keep a lid on it! > > > > > > > > > > > We have only one rule here in PoliticalForum: "Govern > Yourself With > > > > > > > > > Dignity, and be respectful of each and every other Member". > You can > > > > > > > > find > > > > > > > > > this rule, and our guidelines here: > > > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum/web/political-forum-dec... > > > > > > > > > > > For the most part, all of us here have known one another > for years. > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > the proverbial "Newbie", being only a member since April of > last > > > > > > year. > > > > > > > > > Everyone seems to get along, and there is no reason for > slinging > > > > > > hateful, > > > > > > > > > nasty barbs and insulting commentary. > > > > > > > > > > > There is a distinction between debate, I dare say even > heated debate, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > just downright offensive name calling and insult slinging. > We don't > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > here, and if that is the only way that you can express > yourself, then > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > strongly suggest that you find another political discussion > board. > > > > > > It > > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > don't work here. > > > > > > > > > > > The rule goes for everyone, from any political persuasion, > and there > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > exceptions. > > > > > > > > > > > If someone got their feelings hurt by something said here > during the > > > > > > last > > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, then I take full responsibility. Again, I > apologize > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > not being around like I was supposed to be. I have > corrected that > > > > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > > > There is also a distinction between using colorful > metaphors, and > > > > > > > > slinging > > > > > > > > > insulting "nasties" at another member, and we all know what > I am > > > > > > talking > > > > > > > > > about. By example, Holly on occasion and from time to > time uses > > > > > > the, > > > > > > > > > "Colorful Metaphors".....Holly is not being insulting when > he uses > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > language, Holly has been doing this ever since I have been > a member > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > PF, > > > > > > > > > and I have no problem with it....As stated, that is the way > that he > > > > > > > > > expresses himself, and his comments are not directed at any > one > > > > > > member to > > > > > > > > > insult them. Those of you who seem to want to analogize > another > > > > > > Member > > > > > > > > > with a part of either the male, or female anatomy, and/or > make a > > > > > > > > comparison > > > > > > > > > to a Member with human, or any other animal species' body > waste, > > > > > > again, > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > is unacceptable. > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I apologize for my absence. I respectfully ask > that everyone > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > respectful of each and every other member, and if there is > a > > > > > > question, > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > if there is anything in this message that you don't > understand, then > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > means, please feel free to contact me by e-mail. > > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > > > > KeithInTampa > > > > > > > > > Co-Moderator > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Keith, nice to write but I don't believe you. > Virtually every > > > > > > > > > > reply Bruce writes has his puerile little references to > dicks, shit > > > > > > > > > > etc... Now suddenly you are concerned that anyone does > it? You're > > > > > > > > > > lying and the proof will come as soon as Bruce writes his > next few > > > > > > > > > > replies and lo what do you know - he remains in the group > anyway > > > > > > > > > > because as the pigs put it "some are more equal than > others". > > > > > > > > > > Look I don't care. I don't bother reading his replies > etc... > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > > it's all the same pattern: 1. Find something to criticize > 2. > > > > > > Disagree > > > > > > > > > > with any point made by those have have kicked his ass in > various > > > > > > > > > > discussions (poor little guy definitely holds onto anger > ;). 3. > > > > > > When > > > > > > > > > > he starts getting his ass kicked again, act like he was > talking on > > > > > > > > > > some larger, philosophical level that no one else can > understand (a > > > > > > > > > > tactic used by both extremists and mental ward patients) > 4. Make > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > insults. 5. Start new post or replies. 6. Repeat pattern. > Just take > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > look at any thread and it's evident. I can provide a > dozen examples > > > > > > > > > > that are laughably dead on to this. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are people who are actually worth engaging in > debates with - > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > then there is Bruce. And Zeb. And on the Left, Saint > Bezaerk and > > > > > > > > > > Rebel. They all possess pretty much the same personal > character. > > > > > > Their > > > > > > > > > > weakness and fragile egos are evidenced by their > inability to ever > > > > > > > > > > acknowldge countering points. Instead, like any > frightened small > > > > > > > > > > animal, they attack the moment they feel cornered. Pretty > basic > > > > > > > > > > psych101 stuff and really, who cares? > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other side, I've actually reconsidered a few of my > opinions > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > subejects because of (surprisingly) Dick, Hollywood > (there's two > > > > > > ends > > > > > > > > > > of the spectrum for you!) and others who have the > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
