Hey, I gave it a shot. I had some tight parameters to work with. Only 53. Enough money to live on till 99. Not allowed to talk about it.
How about this one: Holly was a car salesman working in a Mercedes dealership, where he meets and strikes up a "relationship" with a woman much older than himself and with some public image. He cons her into thinking he loves her and they marry, whereupon Holly begins a string of dalliances with younger attractive women. His "wife" is outraged and in the divorce agreement, she sets him up for life under the condition that he makes no disclosures, public or private about their marriage or the conditions of its dissolution. On Jul 13, 12:57 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > Zeb, > > It sure does, speculate all you wish. > One normally ends up in the truck of a car parked in an alley with an > ice-pick handle growing out of his ear for doing something like that. > Of course there IS the witness protection program I hear. Good > imagination Zeb ol' boy. > > On Jul 13, 11:51 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE that story. > > > Hmmm...I guess that leaves us to speculate. Lets see....Holly was a > > mid level distributor of pot operating out of Florida. He makes tons > > of money and launders it into legal businesses but gets busted. The > > Feds, however, aren't really interested in taking Holly down, they > > want the guys above him. Holly gets a good lawyer and the deal is, he > > gives up his sources, gets out of the business and , here's the good > > part, gets to keep his ill gotten gains. > > > Close? > > > On Jul 13, 12:32 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > KIT, > > > > Sorry you have to work so hard, sounds like you have been putting in a > > > lot of time. > > > I know YOUR joking, but there are morons around here that take such > > > statements to heart. It would tickle you to death to know just how I > > > made the money that enabled me to retire at age 53 in a position where > > > I will not have to worry about money unless I live past the age of 99. > > > But I'll never tell. Really, I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE that > > > story. But it's a great one! > > > > On Jul 12, 10:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I am literally laughing out loud Holly!!! > > > > > Sometimes....You do really tickle me!!! > > > > > Some of us have jobs buddy!!! We all can't go around driving > > > > dilapidated > > > > school buses, toting illegal aliens to the polls now can we? (LOL! > > > > That > > > > was a joke Holly!!) > > > > > In this case, I have been giving literally over a 100 hours a week, for > > > > the > > > > last couple......This week looks to be another ball buster! > > > > Nevertheless, I > > > > will make time to check in on you, FreddieJack, and Young Bruce!! > > > > > Have a great week! > > > > > Keith > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Hollywood > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > Why, I wait in breathless anticipation to read your every golden > > > > > word. :-) > > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:47 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > It's nice to know that I am missed Holly......I haven't been active > > > > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > board, other than this weekend, in almost two weeks. Glad to see > > > > > > that > > > > > you > > > > > > noticed..... > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Hollywood > > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > Huh? You've been MIA for a couple of weeks? I spoke to you on > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > thread maybe 6 or 7 hours ago. Do you mean MIA in your capacity > > > > > > > as a > > > > > > > moderator, but not as a posting member? Have I been talking to > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > Keith In Tampa????? > > > > > > > Heck, you posted in this thread today. What gives? > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:32 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Fred, Bruce, Holly, Richard, and all Group Members, > > > > > > > > > I sincerely apologize, to Mark, to Mystery Moderater No. 1, > > > > > > > (affectionately > > > > > > > > called, "Newie" even though (s)he's been around the block a few > > > > > times) > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > most importantly, to the Group as a whole. I was missing in > > > > > > > > action > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, my schedule was rather hectic, (No.....I was > > > > > slammed!!) > > > > > > > > and I literally had no time for moderation, much less trying to > > > > > > > > turn > > > > > the > > > > > > > > light bulb on for Fred/Jack, Sean "SugarShack" Virtual Truth, > > > > > > > > Studio, > > > > > > > > Fritzie, Bill, Biffie, Golem, and all of our friends over at > > > > > Euwetopia. > > > > > > > > > In a nutshell, Bruce's comments were out of line, as were > > > > > > > > several > > > > > other > > > > > > > > members. I don't know who started it; I point Bruce out, > > > > > > > > because it > > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > > as though you Fred, are inferring that Young Bruce is getting > > > > > > > > some > > > > > kind > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > special treatment, and that is incorrect. The bottom line is, > > > > > > > > we > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > allow for the nasty, vile personal attacks against another Group > > > > > Member, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > I salute Mark for trying to keep a lid on it! > > > > > > > > > We have only one rule here in PoliticalForum: "Govern Yourself > > > > > > > > With > > > > > > > > Dignity, and be respectful of each and every other Member". > > > > > > > > You can > > > > > > > find > > > > > > > > this rule, and our guidelines here: > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum/web/political-forum-dec... > > > > > > > > > For the most part, all of us here have known one another for > > > > > > > > years. > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > the proverbial "Newbie", being only a member since April of last > > > > > year. > > > > > > > > Everyone seems to get along, and there is no reason for slinging > > > > > hateful, > > > > > > > > nasty barbs and insulting commentary. > > > > > > > > > There is a distinction between debate, I dare say even heated > > > > > > > > debate, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > just downright offensive name calling and insult slinging. We > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > do > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > here, and if that is the only way that you can express > > > > > > > > yourself, then > > > > > I > > > > > > > > strongly suggest that you find another political discussion > > > > > > > > board. > > > > > It > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > don't work here. > > > > > > > > > The rule goes for everyone, from any political persuasion, and > > > > > > > > there > > > > > are > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > exceptions. > > > > > > > > > If someone got their feelings hurt by something said here > > > > > > > > during the > > > > > last > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, then I take full responsibility. Again, I > > > > > > > > apologize > > > > > for > > > > > > > > not being around like I was supposed to be. I have corrected > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > There is also a distinction between using colorful metaphors, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > slinging > > > > > > > > insulting "nasties" at another member, and we all know what I am > > > > > talking > > > > > > > > about. By example, Holly on occasion and from time to time > > > > > > > > uses > > > > > the, > > > > > > > > "Colorful Metaphors".....Holly is not being insulting when he > > > > > > > > uses > > > > > such > > > > > > > > language, Holly has been doing this ever since I have been a > > > > > > > > member > > > > > of > > > > > > > PF, > > > > > > > > and I have no problem with it....As stated, that is the way > > > > > > > > that he > > > > > > > > expresses himself, and his comments are not directed at any one > > > > > member to > > > > > > > > insult them. Those of you who seem to want to analogize > > > > > > > > another > > > > > Member > > > > > > > > with a part of either the male, or female anatomy, and/or make a > > > > > > > comparison > > > > > > > > to a Member with human, or any other animal species' body waste, > > > > > again, > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > is unacceptable. > > > > > > > > > Again, I apologize for my absence. I respectfully ask that > > > > > > > > everyone > > > > > be > > > > > > > > respectful of each and every other member, and if there is a > > > > > question, > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > if there is anything in this message that you don't understand, > > > > > > > > then > > > > > by > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > means, please feel free to contact me by e-mail. > > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > > KeithInTampa > > > > > > > > Co-Moderator > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well Keith, nice to write but I don't believe you. Virtually > > > > > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > reply Bruce writes has his puerile little references to > > > > > > > > > dicks, shit > > > > > > > > > etc... Now suddenly you are concerned that anyone does it? > > > > > > > > > You're > > > > > > > > > lying and the proof will come as soon as Bruce writes his > > > > > > > > > next few > > > > > > > > > replies and lo what do you know - he remains in the group > > > > > > > > > anyway > > > > > > > > > because as the pigs put it "some are more equal than others". > > > > > > > > > Look I don't care. I don't bother reading his replies etc... > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > it's all the same pattern: 1. Find something to criticize 2. > > > > > Disagree > > > > > > > > > with any point made by those have have kicked his ass in > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > discussions (poor little guy definitely holds onto anger ;). > > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > When > > > > > > > > > he starts getting his ass kicked again, act like he was > > > > > > > > > talking on > > > > > > > > > some larger, philosophical level that no one else can > > > > > > > > > understand (a > > > > > > > > > tactic used by both extremists and mental ward patients) 4. > > > > > > > > > Make > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > insults. 5. Start new post or replies. 6. Repeat pattern. > > > > > > > > > Just take > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > look at any thread and it's evident. I can provide a dozen > > > > > > > > > examples > > > > > > > > > that are laughably dead on to this. > > > > > > > > > > There are people who are actually worth engaging in debates > > > > > > > > > with - > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > then there is Bruce. And Zeb. And on the Left, Saint Bezaerk > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > Rebel. They all possess pretty much the same personal > > > > > > > > > character. > > > > > Their > > > > > > > > > weakness and fragile egos are evidenced by their inability to > > > > > > > > > ever > > > > > > > > > acknowldge countering points. Instead, like any frightened > > > > > > > > > small > > > > > > > > > animal, they attack the moment they feel cornered. Pretty > > > > > > > > > basic > > > > > > > > > psych101 stuff and really, who cares? > > > > > > > > > > On the other side, I've actually reconsidered a few of my > > > > > > > > > opinions > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > subejects because of (surprisingly) Dick, Hollywood (there's > > > > > > > > > two > > > > > ends > > > > > > > > > of the spectrum for you!) and others who have the > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
