Sage your own article contradict the current facts and
I posted the specific part that contradicts the Bush Apologists
who say Cheney did not have to notify Congress. The White House
AGREED to notify Congress in the Article, so what changed?

On Jul 16, 8:58 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>           Hi Keith,
>
>           Is VT for real? I gave him the article the NYT wrote back in
> December 2002. Then they ( NYT ) come out in 2009 and claim no one
> knew. Huh !  The NYT must think guys like VT are morons. All to save
> face for Nancy ( tb ) Pelosi..
>
> ***************************************************************************************************************************************
>
> On Jul 16, 8:51 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately the history of the Bush Administration contradicts your
> > opinion. If this was never implemented, why was so much money spent?
> > Why was it closed and then reopened? Answer those questions please.
>
> > On Jul 16, 8:43 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sugarshack,
>
> > > What I find a bit ironic, is this whole, "Alex Jones-ish/Wacko Right,
> > > Conspiratorialist Crackpot" type mentality, that is coming from the "Wacko
> > > Left, Socialist-Elitist Moonbats".
>
> > > There was no covert attempt to take out al Queda leaders, there was a 
> > > plan,
> > > which was never initiated or carried through.
>
> > > There was a plan to invade Japan with American forces back in 1942-1943,
> > > that was not carried out either.  There was a plan to invade Cuba with
> > > poisoned rabbits that was never carried out.  There have been numerous 
> > > plans
> > > discussed.
>
> > > What is the big deal, other than Nanc, Harry, Di-Fi, Babs, Rahm, and a 
> > > host
> > > of other socialists want to detract from the largest tax increase that has
> > > ever been put into place upon the American people, the economy is failing
> > > miserably, and the Obama Administration is attempting to re-write our 
> > > whole
> > > way of life, our style of government and economics, etc., and this is
> > > nothing more, and nothing less than another mechanism to detract the
> > > American people's attention.
>
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM, VT VirtualTruth
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > OK Sage WHY did Cheney then say to the CIA NOT
> > > > to inform Congress when the article said the Bush
> > > > Administration WOULD keep Congress in the loop?
>
> > > > Under current intelligence law, the president must sign a finding to
> > > > provide the legal basis for covert actions to be carried out by the
> > > > C.I.A. In response to past abuses, the decision-making process has
> > > > grown into a highly formalized review in which the White House,
> > > > Justice Department, State Department, Pentagon and C.I.A. take part.
>
> > > > The administration must notify Congressional leaders of any covert
> > > > action finding signed by the president. In the case of the
> > > > presidential finding authorizing the use of lethal force against
> > > > members of Al Qaeda, Congressional leaders have been notified as
> > > > required, the officials said.
>
> > > > On Jul 16, 5:51 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >              VT try again:
>
> > > >www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/international/15INTE.html?pagewanted=2
>
> > > > ***************************************************************************­******************************************************
>
> > > > > On Jul 16, 5:19 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > The link did not work, something about a seven day period.
>
> > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:38 am, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >              VT,
>
> > > > > > >                 Why is it that you and your liberal friends are 
> > > > > > > lying
> > > > > > > about this. It is obviously a political cover for Pelosi's
> > > > > > > accusations.  Read the attached link that the NYT published in 
> > > > > > > Dec.
> > > > > > > 2002.
> > > > > > >                
> > > > > > > www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/international/15INTE......
>
> > > > ***************************************************************************­­**************************************************************************­*­*************************************************************************­**
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:03 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I find no reason to
> > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the
> > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman.
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > I do and so did Cheney.
>
> > > > > > > > so,  the military was given a green light to kill our enemies 
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > not
> > > > > > > > the CIA?
> > > > > > > > that's insanity
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to
> > > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the
> > > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman.
>
> > > > > > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their
> > > > supporters.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis 
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an Al
> > > > qaeda
> > > > > > > > > > > hit team illegal?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign
> > > > > > > > > > > countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Just a thought.....- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to