Nice try Wimpy. That is a CertifcaTION of live Birth as opposed to a
CetifiCATE of Live Birth. Read the difference below, Junior.


Q: Is a certification of live birth the same thing as a birth
certificate in Hawaii?


Answer: They are two different documents.

A "Certification of Live Birth" is a short form birth certificate. The
information included in the document may differ from state to state. A
"Certification of Live Birth" from Hawaii will include the name and
sex of the person, date of birth, hour of birth, island of birth,
county of birth, mother's maiden name, mother's race, father's name,
father's race, date accepted by registrar, a certificate number and
seal. The seal may be different depending on the year it was printed.

A Birth Certificate, or "Certificate of Live Birth," is the long form
birth certificate and contains more detailed information, including
signatures of doctor(s), witnesses, vital statistics (length and
weight), etc.

According to the Department of Hawaiian Homelands:

"In order to process your application (to verify that you are a
genuine native Hawaiian), DHHL utilizes information that is found only
on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or
green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the
Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout).
Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time
and money since the computer-generated Certification requires
additional verification by DHHL."

Per Hawaiian law, Statue 338.13, any certified copies of the original
document can serve the same purpose as the original document.

"(b) Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the
department, certified by the department shall be considered for all
purposes the same as the original, subject to the requirements of
sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18."

Usually the certification is stamped and signed on the lower reverse
side of the document and says "I certify this is a true copy or
abstract of the record on file in the Hawaii State Department of
Health."

On Jul 16, 9:25 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/obamas-certificatio...
>
> On Jul 16, 9:12 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > As soon as you tell  us why Obama won't produce his birth certificate.
> > Can you say "Kenyan?"
>
> > On Jul 16, 8:51 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Unfortunately the history of the Bush Administration contradicts your
> > > opinion. If this was never implemented, why was so much money spent?
> > > Why was it closed and then reopened? Answer those questions please.
>
> > > On Jul 16, 8:43 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Sugarshack,
>
> > > > What I find a bit ironic, is this whole, "Alex Jones-ish/Wacko Right,
> > > > Conspiratorialist Crackpot" type mentality, that is coming from the 
> > > > "Wacko
> > > > Left, Socialist-Elitist Moonbats".
>
> > > > There was no covert attempt to take out al Queda leaders, there was a 
> > > > plan,
> > > > which was never initiated or carried through.
>
> > > > There was a plan to invade Japan with American forces back in 1942-1943,
> > > > that was not carried out either.  There was a plan to invade Cuba with
> > > > poisoned rabbits that was never carried out.  There have been numerous 
> > > > plans
> > > > discussed.
>
> > > > What is the big deal, other than Nanc, Harry, Di-Fi, Babs, Rahm, and a 
> > > > host
> > > > of other socialists want to detract from the largest tax increase that 
> > > > has
> > > > ever been put into place upon the American people, the economy is 
> > > > failing
> > > > miserably, and the Obama Administration is attempting to re-write our 
> > > > whole
> > > > way of life, our style of government and economics, etc., and this is
> > > > nothing more, and nothing less than another mechanism to detract the
> > > > American people's attention.
>
> > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM, VT VirtualTruth
> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > OK Sage WHY did Cheney then say to the CIA NOT
> > > > > to inform Congress when the article said the Bush
> > > > > Administration WOULD keep Congress in the loop?
>
> > > > > Under current intelligence law, the president must sign a finding to
> > > > > provide the legal basis for covert actions to be carried out by the
> > > > > C.I.A. In response to past abuses, the decision-making process has
> > > > > grown into a highly formalized review in which the White House,
> > > > > Justice Department, State Department, Pentagon and C.I.A. take part.
>
> > > > > The administration must notify Congressional leaders of any covert
> > > > > action finding signed by the president. In the case of the
> > > > > presidential finding authorizing the use of lethal force against
> > > > > members of Al Qaeda, Congressional leaders have been notified as
> > > > > required, the officials said.
>
> > > > > On Jul 16, 5:51 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >              VT try again:
>
> > > > >www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/international/15INTE.html?pagewanted=2
>
> > > > > *********************************************************************************************************************************
>
> > > > > > On Jul 16, 5:19 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > The link did not work, something about a seven day period.
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:38 am, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >              VT,
>
> > > > > > > >                 Why is it that you and your liberal friends are 
> > > > > > > > lying
> > > > > > > > about this. It is obviously a political cover for Pelosi's
> > > > > > > > accusations.  Read the attached link that the NYT published in 
> > > > > > > > Dec.
> > > > > > > > 2002.
> > > > > > > >                
> > > > > > > > www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/international/15INTE......
>
> > > > > ***************************************************************************­***************************************************************************­***************************************************************************
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:03 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > I find no reason to
> > > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the
> > > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman.
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > I do and so did Cheney.
>
> > > > > > > > > so,  the military was given a green light to kill our enemies 
> > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > the CIA?
> > > > > > > > > that's insanity
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth 
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to
> > > > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the
> > > > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their
> > > > > supporters.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis 
> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Al
> > > > > qaeda
> > > > > > > > > > > > hit team illegal?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign
> > > > > > > > > > > > countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Just a thought.....- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to