Studio, I watched a movie with a wonderful line -- "It's useless arguing with a Drunk"... Ideologues and suspecting partisans are usually Drunk and are immune to inconvenient facts... That is your situation relating to Bush...
I will note you do not mention the notion of who controls the National Guard or if they could deal with law and order with the governor's approval... I note that you limit the UNSC's definition of WMD to nuclear... Saddam did have WMD if one uses the UNSC's definition of WMD... I also note you focus only on Media spin on the various arguments for removing Saddam -- i.e. WMD only, go back and read the speaches and policy papers the Bush's WH gave prior to the invasion... On Aug 27, 4:10 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 27, 2:54 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So your major problem with Bush was he was not ruthless enough in > > attacking the victims of Hurricane Katrina? Once again you show you > > hatred of ordinary working Americans. This time you sink to a new low > > by demanding that victims of Bush indifference should be put to the > > sword. > > If the newly appointed Secretary of Home Land Security Chertoff hadn't > sold more power hungry lies of a terrorist threat after Katrina to > block any assistance from occurring, it assuredly would have had > different results. That's assuming Bush Jr. or Cheney wouldn't have > blocked relief instead of Chertoff. But what was apparent was that > Bush Jr. didn't know or really care what was going on other than the > $1000. debt cards issued weeks after most of the looting had already > taken place. And this just to make him look compassionate for > political reasons. > > > As regarding the issue of missing WMD's, the former UN inspector Hans > > Blix put it best. "If the U.S. is sure that Saddam Hussein has weapons > > of mass destruction, then they must know where they are - so where are > > they? " > > Of that, there's practically no doubt that Bush Jr. and company sold > their beliefs as facts. > > > Keith where are they? If Bush is not a liar then where are the > > weapons? Where are the 29,000 mid-range missles that the U.S. claimed > > Iraq had - so far they have located 5. Where are the othe 28.995, > > under someone's bed? > > Not only that, but what Bush Jr. sold the American people during a > SOTU address was that Iraq had nuclear weapons grade material and was > just months away from striking the US. > > If intelligence gathering was that bad, which apparently it was, why > in the world would he then authorize intelligence to gather > information on captured suspects? > One can only conclude the whole thing is not only based on lies, but > that the American people can't be trusted with any truths. So that > those Americans who *think* they know what the truth is, can't > possibly know, they can only assume because the same children who need > to be insulated from any truths. > > A wink is as good as a nod to a blind bat. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
