Bruce,

Dream on. And don't start up again with the name-calling and personal
insult B.S. You know full well I can dish it back untill you choke on
it.

On Sep 6, 12:34 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> holly the people are taking your fascist leaders out one by one
> two of your governors are going down in november
>
> that noise isn't a whine
>
> it's your nazi heroes farting and soiling themselves retard
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Sage2.
>
> > Ohhhhh, what kind of cheese would you like with your whine?
>
> > On Sep 5, 12:39 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >                      Holly,
>
> > >       Obama and his administration promised  " transparency " and we
> > > have yet to see any such thing for the past eight months, and I doubt
> > > we'll see any for the next forty .
>
> > ***************************************************************************­­**************************************
>
> > > On Sep 5, 10:12 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > dick,
>
> > > > Thought you guys wanted more transparency from this administration?
>
> > > > On Sep 4, 10:58 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > strange that they are able to release study notes and curricula on a
> > > > > speech but not the speech.  Kinda makes you wonder whether they are
> > > > > waiting to see what the fallout on the curricula and study notes is
> > > > > before they actually write the speech.
>
> > > > > Hollywood wrote:
> > > > > > dick,
>
> > > > > > Mentioning something is not the same thing as providing a
> > transcript
> > > > > > of the actual speech. That should be obvious.
>
> > > > > > On Sep 3, 4:09 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > >> Speech has not been released but in the link I just sent you they
> > > > > >> mention it.   There is also a link starting Friday to find out
> > more.
> > > > > >> The link is:
>
> > > > > >>http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/academic/bts.html
>
> > > > > >> This is from the Dept of Ed.
>
> > > > > >> Hollywood wrote:
>
> > > > > >>> dick,
>
> > > > > >>> Does anyone have an actual transcript of the actual speech?
> > Please
> > > > > >>> post it and let's have an end to all these claims of what the
> > POTUS
> > > > > >>> REALLY means.
>
> > > > > >>> Politicians usually don't waste campaign speeches on those too
> > young
> > > > > >>> to vote, for God's sake.
>
> > > > > >>> On Sep 3, 2:20 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>> Got this posting from Jim Miller.  He expresses the point I have
> > been
> > > > > >>>> trying to make the Holly if I can get past his failure to
> > interpret what
> > > > > >>>> is actually being said.
>
> > > > > >>>> *Barack Obama Will Make A Campaign Speech To School Kids Next
> > Week:  *
> > > > > >>>> Michael and Diane Medved are not pleased
> > > > > >>>> <
> >http://townhall.com/columnists/MichaelMedved/2009/09/02/abusing_schoo...>.
>
> > > > > >>>>     My wife Diane seldom gets upset about politics.  But
> > President
> > > > > >>>>     Barack Obama's recent demonstration of megalomania in
> > insisting on
> > > > > >>>>     beginning the school year by simultaneously addressing all
> > public
> > > > > >>>>     school kids in the United States elicited a concise
> > response:  "it's
> > > > > >>>>     sick."
>
> > > > > >>>>     In addition to her Ph.D. in psychology, Diane holds an M.A.
> > in
> > > > > >>>>     Education, and both primary and secondary teaching
> > credentials in
> > > > > >>>>     California.  She has raised and educated our three kids,
> > each of
> > > > > >>>>     whom received some combination of home schooling, parochial
> > > > > >>>>     education, and public schools.  What bothers her (and many
> > > > > >>>>     courageous teachers across the country) is the crude attempt
> > by the
> > > > > >>>>     Department of Education and the White House to blur all
> > distinctions
> > > > > >>>>     between education and cult-of-personality propaganda.
>
> > > > > >>>> How do I know it's a campaign speech, since I haven't read it?
> >  By
> > > > > >>>> reading the lesson plan
> > > > > >>>> <
> >http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10582301/President-Obama%E2%80%99s-Addres...>.
> > > > > >>>>  The worst part of the plan is one of the things the students
> > may be
> > > > > >>>> asked to do after the speech:
>
> > > > > >>>>     Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help
> > the
> > > > > >>>>     president.  These would be collected and redistributed at an
> > > > > >>>>     appropriate later date by the teacher to make students
> > accountable
> > > > > >>>>     to their goals.
>
> > > > > >>>> It is legitimate to ask students what they can do to help the
> > country.
> > > > > >>>>  It is not legitimate --- in a republic --- to ask students what
> > they
> > > > > >>>> can do to help a particular leader.
>
> > > > > >>>> (One thing Obama's team seems to have missed:  This speech to
> > school
> > > > > >>>> kids will provide a great straight line for many comedians, and
> > some of
> > > > > >>>> those comedians will accept Obama's offer.  If you think of a
> > good one,
> > > > > >>>> or hear a good one, let me know about it.)
> > > > > >>>> - 2:49 PM, 2 September 2009
> > > > > >>>> *The White House* is "clarifying"
> > > > > >>>> <
> >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/02/wh-withdraws-call-stu...>
> > > > > >>>> the language in the lesson plan, presumably in order to remove
> > the more
> > > > > >>>> political parts.  Most likely, Obama's speech will just be an
> > > > > >>>> interruption of school time, not a full-blown campaign speech.
>
> > > > > >>>> For amusement, you may want to read about reactions from
> > Democratic
> > > > > >>>> leaders in 1991, when President George H. W. Bush made a speech
> > from a
> > > > > >>>> school
> > > > > >>>> <
> >http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/09/03/flashback-1991-...>.
>
> > > > > >>>> A few conservatives have said that they would keep their kids
> > out of
> > > > > >>>> school during Obama's speech.   That's silly in my opinion; if
> > there is
> > > > > >>>> anything offensive in the speech, it is better to explain that
> > to kids
> > > > > >>>> after they hear it.
> > > > > >>>> - 11:04 AM, 3 September 2009   [link]
> > > > > >>>> <
> >http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/September2009_1.html#jrm7790>-
> > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to