Is it not strange to all that " gays " do not have the natural ability to procreate. A man & a man, can not a child carry, a woman & a woman can not a child germinate. The only rights any have is life and giving life. There are a low percentage of heterosexuals that are unable to procreate because of infertility but there are no gay men combination or lesbian pair that can. Anything other than heterosexuality is merely a perversion and any perversion in heterosexuality is nothing but perversion. It is always the perverts that proclaim rights for that which is obviously wrong.
******************************************************************************************************************************************* On Jan 9, 9:56 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > The 1,138 Benefits and Protections of Marriage > Direct link:http://www.gao.gov/atext/d04353r.txt > > On 1/9/11, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Markie Mark- > > > Here is your homework assignment. > > > Read thes 1,138 Federal Statutes about Civil Marriage Rights which are > > denied to same gender couples, and then report back tell me why you > > were wrong 1,138 times. > > > The 1,138 Benefits and Protections of Marriage > > Click Here: > >http://www.ralliance.org/1138.html > > > On 1/9/11, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Markie Mark- > > >> Wrong again. There are over 1,300 codified laws and privleges directly > >> concerning civil marriage and marriage contracts. Those laws concern > >> the ACT and contract, and NOT the "one word" as you falsely claim. > > >> On 1/9/11, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Tommy, tommy , tooooooommmmmmmyyyyyy, > > >>> Government has NOT codified "Marriage" as you are using it. They have > >>> simply > >>> defined the word "marriage" (not the act of being "joined" legally, > >>> civilly > >>> or religiously. > > >>> Read the statute... it is all about the definition of ONE word... NOT > >>> the > >>> act. > > >>> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Wrong again, Keithie Keith Keith. > > >>>> I suggest you take a good look at the 14th Amendment again, and at the > >>>> recent court rulings on DOMA and Prop 8, and you will see that you are > >>>> incorrect. > > >>>> Civil marriage is not Religious marriage, and I suggest you get that > >>>> simple concept through your thick offensive anti-gay animus filled > >>>> homophobic skull. > > >>>> As long as the government codifies civil marriage, all citizens must > >>>> be included in those laws equally regardless of gender. Anything less > >>>> is unconstitutional, discriminatory, and unjust. Churches are then > >>>> free to bless those civil marriages or not as they choose. There are > >>>> plenty of Progressive churches that will. > > >>>> You are repeating your false Reich wing spin, Lil' Keithie Keith. > > >>>> On 1/8/11, Keith In Köln <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > DOMA is very much Constitutional, This is where folks try and > >>>> > redefine > >>>> the > >>>> > term and concept of marriage, which is a ecclisastical function. Tom > >>>> > and > >>>> > most militant Gays who wish to force their lifestyle down Americans' > >>>> > proverbial throats, (Note how Tom defined and described the term > >>>> > "Gay" > >>>> > above, yet a few days ago was attempting to claim that the term, > >>>> > "Gay" > >>>> had > >>>> > nothing at all to do with sexuality) want to redefine the term and > >>>> concept > >>>> > of marriage, in order to force their secularist beliefs upon the > >>>> > American > >>>> > public. > > >>>> > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:27 AM, GregfromBoston > >>>> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>> >> Tell the president. I did > > >>>> >> On Jan 7, 9:22 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> >> > Yes, Greg. > > >>>> >> > I believe that DOMA is indeed unconstitutuional. > > >>>> >> > On 1/7/11, GregfromBoston <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> >> > > Well Tom, you just echoed the court on why DOMA is > >>>> >> > > unconstitutional. > >>>> >> > > It IS. > > >>>> >> > > On Jan 7, 8:22 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> >> > >> Markie Mark- > > >>>> >> > >> Your statements are naive and you are clearly uneducated. > > >>>> >> > >> At the time the Constitution was written in the late 18th > >>>> >> > >> Century, > >>>> >> "gay" > >>>> >> > >> simply meant festive, happy, or beautiful, and the term had > >>>> >> > >> nothing > >>>> >> > >> to > >>>> >> do > >>>> >> > >> with sexuality whatsoever. Since the term did not refer to > >>>> >> same-gendered > >>>> >> > >> "friendship", which was the term used for same gender > >>>> >> > >> relationships > >>>> >> > >> at > >>>> >> > >> that > >>>> >> > >> time, the term "gay" does not exist in the Constitution at all, > >>>> >> > >> as > >>>> >> > >> the > >>>> >> > >> term > >>>> >> > >> as we now use it did not exist. In fact, in the 1780's, Sex was > >>>> >> > >> rarely > >>>> >> > >> ever > >>>> >> > >> discussed or mentioned at all outside of close private > >>>> >> > >> encounters > >>>> >> between > >>>> >> > >> "friends" and couples behind closed doors. The Constitution > >>>> >> > >> does, > >>>> >> however, > >>>> >> > >> state in the 14th amendment that discrimination against any > >>>> >> > >> citizen > >>>> >> > >> is > >>>> >> > >> unlawful: " All persons born or naturalized in the United > >>>> >> > >> States, > >>>> and > >>>> >> > >> subject to the jurisdiction <glossary.html#JURIS> thereof, are > >>>> >> citizens of > >>>> >> > >> the United States and of the State wherein they reside.( No ) > >>>> >> > >> State > >>>> >> shall > >>>> >> > >> make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or > >>>> >> immunities > >>>> >> > >> of > >>>> >> > >> citizens of the United States; nor shall any State > >>>> >> > >> deprive<glossary.html#DEPRIVE>any person of life, liberty, or > >>>> >> > >> property, without due > >>>> >> > >> process <consttop_duep.html> of law; nor deny to any person > >>>> >> > >> within > >>>> >> > >> its > >>>> >> > >> jurisdiction <glossary.html#JURIS> the equal protection of the > >>>> laws." > >>>> >> > >> Therefore, the current unequal second calss citizen status of > >>>> >> > >> gays > >>>> in > >>>> >> the > >>>> >> > >> United States is unlawful, unconstitutional, and > >>>> >> > >> discriminatory. > > >>>> >> > >> So there you have it, Markie. I hope that this lesson in > >>>> >> > >> etymology > >>>> >> > >> and > >>>> >> the > >>>> >> > >> Constitution enlightens you somewhat. > > >>>> >> > >> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE > >>>> >> > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>> >> > >> > Tommy, > > >>>> >> > >> > Please list all rights as enumerated in the Constitution that > >>>> Gays > >>>> >> > >> > (etc) do not have. > > >>>> >> > >> > You constantly harp about "RIGHTS" .... You never list them. > >>>> >> > >> > Just > >>>> >> what > >>>> >> > >> > are those "Rights" that you feel are absent in your life that > >>>> >> > >> > others > >>>> >> > >> > have. > > >>>> >> > >> > Please DO NOT list "Privileges" or "Licenses" that can only > >>>> >> > >> > be > >>>> >> granted > >>>> >> > >> > on a State level. > > >>>> >> > >> > ONLY "Rights" are meant to be universal... The different > >>>> >> "privileges" > >>>> >> > >> > and "licenses" that are left to the "Several States" are not > >>>> >> > >> > now > >>>> >> nor > >>>> >> > >> > were they ever meant to be, "Rights". > > >>>> >> > >> > Each State is in itself "Sovereign" with local rules being > >>>> >> > >> > that > >>>> >> which > >>>> >> > >> > makes a State attractive to one and repulsive to another. (I > >>>> would > >>>> >> > >> > NEVER live in Texas) > > >>>> >> > >> > Traffic laws, Domestic violence laws, noise laws, land use > >>>> >> > >> > laws, > >>>> >> > >> > marriage/divorce laws, and even the death penalty laws ALL > >>>> >> > >> > vary > >>>> >> > >> > from > >>>> >> > >> > State to State because the "Several States" have the "Right" > >>>> >> > >> > to > >>>> >> > >> > make > >>>> >> > >> > it so. They must bow to to will of the people in that State > >>>> >> > >> > as > >>>> long > >>>> >> as > >>>> >> > >> > it does not interfere with one of the Federally Guaranteed > >>>> >> > >> > and > >>>> >> > >> > Constitutionally enumerated "Rights". > > >>>> >> > >> > Just which of your Constitutionally Guaranteed and Enumerated > >>>> >> "Rights" > >>>> >> > >> > are you lacking ?? > > >>>> >> > >> > I'll wait for the list and your personal explanation for > >>>> >> > >> > each. > >>>> Then > >>>> >> we > >>>> >> > >> > can discuss it. > > >>>> >> > >> > I am anxiously awaiting your well thought-out and accurate > >>>> >> (remember, > >>>> >> > >> > Constitutionally Enumerated "Right") list to begin an earnest > >>>> >> > >> > discussion. > > >>>> >> > >> > -- > >>>> >> > >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>> >> > >> > For options & help seehttp:// > >>>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>> >> > >> > * Visit our other community > >>>> >> > >> > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > >>>> >> > >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>> >> > >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>>> >> > >> -- > >>>> >> > >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > >>>> >> > >> Have a great day, > >>>> >> > >> Tommy- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> >> > >> - Show quoted text - > > >>>> >> > > -- > >>>> >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>> >> > > For options & help > >>>> >> > > seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>> >> > > * Visit our other community > >>>> >> > > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > >>>> >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>> >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>>> >> > -- > >>>> >> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > >>>> >> > Have a great day, > >>>> >> > Tommy- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> >> > - Show quoted text - > > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>> >> * Visit our other community at > >>>> >>http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > >>>> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >>>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>> > * > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
