And you have yet to name even one that is a "Right". These are all "benefits" that have had long standing and upheld definitions..
Try again. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > Here ia a brief list of Federal statutes granted to opposite gender > civil married couples, and denied to same sex couples: > > Social Security Benefits > > Joint Tax Return Filing > > Survivor and Estate Tax Benefits > > Property and chattel sharing > > Joint Tenancy > > Death Benefits > > Spousal insurance benefits > > Funeral benefits > > Military spousal benefits > > Benefits for spouse's children from other previous relationships > > The unconstitutional Defense of Marriage Act > > etc etc etc > > Shall I go on? > > On 1/10/11, Keith In Köln <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> > wrote: > > No again. > > > > Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships are lesser, unequal contracts > > that do not afford all the same 1,238 rights and benefits as civil > > marriage does. > > > > ============== > > > > Tom, > > > > With all due respect, (and we've been here before) I feel as though I am > > whipping a dead horse here) this is rhetoric, and far left spin. There > are > > nbo one thousand twelve hundred and thirty eight "rights and benefits" > that > > Gays ae being denied that a civil marriage would remedy. I have proved > this > > repeatedly, here in the Group and on other sites that you are familiar > > with. The continuation of a prevaricate statement will not make it come > > true! > > > > This is a typical far left extremist ploy. Continue to repeat the lie, > and > > maybe somehow or another, folks will start to believe the lie. > > > > When you are confronted with issues like this, you disappear, or never > > comment further. Again, this is where you continue to prove that those > > with a far left extremist, sometimes Anti-American, or Marxist agenda, > when > > confronted with the truth, look like the proverbial deer in the > headlights. > > You cannot support your rhetoric, hate, smear or lies. > > > > There is but one, "benefit" (and I make the distinction, "benefit" as > > opposed to a "right") that a homosexual couple who would be engaged in a > > civil union would be denied, as compared to a heterosexual couple who are > > married. I doubt if you are even aware of what benefit this even is. > > Other than what I am referencing, I can remedy each and every other > > purported "Denial of Rights and Benefits" with a few documents that I, > or > > anyone else could prepare. > > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > -- > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > Have a great day, > Tommy > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Mark M. Kahle H. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
