Mark: Fox News (gag) is the only approximately tollerable news network I watch. They spell his name: Qaddafi. "G", why would that be? — J. A. A. — > On Apr 25, 1:44 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > "G" it is. I believe he knows how to spell his own name.... > > On Apr 25, 7:18 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks, Jonathan! Mark, with his 'G', is no closer to correct than > > my 'Q' but with ff. I'd rate the guy a double F grade. Agreed? — J. > > A. A. — > > > On Apr 24, 11:37 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > His name in Arabic is /Mu?ammar al-Qad_d_a-fi-. / > > > > On 04/24/2011 08:29 PM, Mark wrote: > > > > > I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no > > > > where near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I > > > > never said I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you > > > > are going to talk about him. > > > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India? > > > > Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation > > > > destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the > > > > USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't > > > > be > > > > welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). � J. A. A. � > > > > > On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <[email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current > > > > Events. > > > > > > They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the > > > > US) their > > > > > food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown > > > > causes > > > > > (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) > > > > is that > > > > > nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all > > > > State functions > > > > > still happen, all taxes are paid. > > > > > > One would think that something as basic as > > > > > > "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to > > > > survive?" > > > > > (answer is a resounding "No") > > > > > > would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States > > > > and those > > > > > Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" > > > > are left > > > > > operating as usual. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein > > > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote: > > > > > > > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. > > > > The > > > > > > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had > > > > > > government contracts would shut down; there would be no > > > > protected food > > > > > > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; > > > > the > > > > > > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start > > > > using > > > > > > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started > > > > > > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't > > > > > > survive without some the public order that is provided by well > > > > thought- > > > > > > out and agreed-to laws. > > > > > > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) > > > > laws > > > > > > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government > > > > will > > > > > > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their > > > > laws. Our > > > > > > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because > > > > Congress > > > > > > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run > > > > things. > > > > > > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! > > > > Read my > > > > > > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen, > > > > > > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any > > > > government > > > > > > employee or elected official, including the President! � J. > > > > A. > > > > > > Armistead � Patriot > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <[email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > Onestone, > > > > > > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the > > > > "experimental" > > > > > > stage. > > > > > > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that > > > > cares. Just > > > > > > why > > > > > > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil > > > > war ?? The > > > > > > laws > > > > > > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples > > > > needs. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein > > > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The > > > > USA would be > > > > > > > > in civil war... � J. A. A. � > > > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley > > > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone > > > > age without > > > > > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national > > > > government for more > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government > > > > doesn't make > > > > > > much > > > > > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives." > > > > > > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I > > > > am an untra- > > > > > > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" > > > > of anyone, > > > > > > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned > > > > liberal. I > > > > > > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am > > > > the exact > > > > > > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more > > > > > > conservative > > > > > > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the > > > > 'stone ages' > > > > > > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, > > > > your "ideal" > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on > > > > Earth. Is > > > > > > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. > > > > Armistead � > > > > > > > > Patriot > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan > > > > Ashley<[email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> John, > > > > > > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one > > > > be "right" of > > > > > > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you > > > > NEVER answer > > > > > > > > > >> questions posed to you.) > > > > > > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is > > > > socialist. I > > > > > > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution > > > > banning > > > > > > government. > > > > > > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't > > > > survive very long > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. � > > > > > > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist > > > > > > constitution. > > > > > > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the > > > > capitalist > > > > > > system > > > > > > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing > > > > that government > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact > > > > that you > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > ask > > > > > > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction > > > > that you are a > > > > > > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. > > > > The remaining > > > > > > 5% > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � > > > > J. A. > > > > > > Armistead > > > > > > > > � > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Patriot > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> John, > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely > > > > downgrades > > > > > > websites > > > > > > > > based > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says > > > > much about > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what > > > > freedom of > > > > > > > > expression means. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic > > > > and social > > > > > > harm > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, > > > > including Hitler" > > > > > > seems > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
