Only a lawyer would argue over what inscription should go on that dictator's tomb. — J. A. A. — > On Apr 24, 11:42 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes it is.... and that Q is pronounced G (I was thinking we were speaking > English here.. Been there done that and met the asshole in the 80's. > > Your source ?? His own web site says it is Gathafi. > > the official site of Muammar *Al* - Welcome to the official site of > *...*<http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/index.htm> > <http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/algathafi.org?pip=false&premium=true...> > Welcome to the official site of Muammar *Al Gathafi*. > Welcome to the official site of > ...<http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/video-en.htm> > - Analysis of the current Crisis of > ...<http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/cat_03_10.htm> > - Contact Us <http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/contactus.htm> > www.*algathafi*.org/html-english/index.htm - > Cached<http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:N86OzbAVwy8J:www...> > - > Similar<http://www.google.co.cr/search?hl=en&nfpr=1&q=related:www.algathafi.o...> > > Any other questions ?? > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Ashley < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > His name in Arabic is *Muʿammar al-Qaḏḏāfī. * > > > On 04/24/2011 08:29 PM, Mark wrote: > > > I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no where > > near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I never said > > I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you are going to talk > > about him. > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India? > >> Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation > >> destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the > >> USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be > >> welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). — J. A. A. — > > >> On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current Events. > > >> > They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the US) their > >> > food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown causes > >> > (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) is that > >> > nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all State > >> functions > >> > still happen, all taxes are paid. > > >> > One would think that something as basic as > > >> > "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?" > >> > (answer is a resounding "No") > > >> > would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States and those > >> > Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" are left > >> > operating as usual. > > >> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected] > >> >wrote: > > >> > > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The > >> > > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had > >> > > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food > >> > > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the > >> > > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using > >> > > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started > >> > > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't > >> > > survive without some the public order that is provided by well > >> thought- > >> > > out and agreed-to laws. > > >> > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws > >> > > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will > >> > > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our > >> > > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress > >> > > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things. > >> > > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my > >> > > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen, > >> > > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government > >> > > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A. > >> > > Armistead — Patriot > > >> > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > Onestone, > > >> > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the > >> "experimental" > >> > > stage. > >> > > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares. > >> Just > >> > > why > >> > > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ?? > >> The > >> > > laws > >> > > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs. > > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein < > >> [email protected] > >> > > >wrote: > > >> > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would > >> be > >> > > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. — > > >> > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley < > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > John, > > >> > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age > >> without > >> > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for > >> more > >> > > than > >> > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't > >> make > >> > > much > >> > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives." > > >> > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >> > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an > >> untra- > >> > > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of > >> anyone, > >> > > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I > >> > > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the > >> exact > >> > > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more > >> > > conservative > >> > > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone > >> ages' > >> > > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your > >> "ideal" > >> > > of > >> > > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. > >> Is > >> > > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead > >> � > >> > > > > Patriot > >> > > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> John, > > >> > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be > >> "right" of > >> > > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER > >> answer > >> > > > > > >> questions posed to you.) > > >> > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is > >> socialist. I > >> > > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning > >> > > government. > >> > > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very > >> long > >> > > on > >> > > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. � > >> > > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist > >> > > constitution. > >> > > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the > >> capitalist > >> > > system > >> > > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that > >> government > >> > > > > should > >> > > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that > >> you > >> > > even > >> > > > > ask > >> > > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you > >> are a > >> > > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The > >> remaining > >> > > 5% > >> > > > > are > >> > > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. > >> > > Armistead > >> > > > > � > >> > > > > > >>>>> Patriot > >> > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>> John, > >> > > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades > >> > > websites > >> > > > > based > >> > > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much > >> about > >> > > your > >> > > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom > >> of > >> > > > > expression means. > >> > > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and > >> social > >> > > harm > >> > > > > to the > >> > > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including > >> Hitler" > >> > > seems > >> > > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able > >> to > >> > > pull > >> > > > > off this > >> > > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task? > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American > >> > > multinational > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, > >> > > California. > >> > > > > Google > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways > >> you are > >> > > > > very > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's > >> neck > >> > > from > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those > >> who > >> > > commit > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on > >> > > > > moderation > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should > >> be > >> > > > > killed? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect > >> those who > >> > > > > kill > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of > >> Americans > >> > > have > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the > >> lack of > >> > > jobs > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
