Realizing it might take MORE effort ... HERE is a rubric for you:
When <insert person> claimed <insert statement by person (with context)> ... he was wrong because of <insert reasons>.
That he was a "Poopeyhead" OR because he likes Hitler OR because he once associated with some other despicable (at least to you) Individual is meaningless.
Regard$,
--MJ
"My yet-to-be-learned lesson -- and perhaps that of Rep. Hubbard -- is that there are certain topics or arguments that one should not bring up in the presence of children or those with little understanding. Both might see that explaining a phenomenon is the same as giving it moral sanction or justification. It's as if one's explanation that the independent influence of gravity on a falling object is to cause it to accelerate at 32 feet per second per second could be interpreted as giving moral sanction and justification to gravity." -- Walter E. Williams
--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
- Re: ABCNews.com: Julian Assange Back... plainolamerican
- Re: ABCNews.com: Julian Assange Backs Ron... MJ
- Re: ABCNews.com: Julian Assange Back... plainolamerican
- Re: ABCNews.com: Julian Assange Backs Ron and Rand Paul MJ
