On Sunday 16 March 2014 20:16:30 AlbyVA wrote:
>   Has anybody else noticed the rapid decline in NTP Pool servers over the
> last couple of months?
<snip>
>  It
> just appears that excessive
> actions are being taken against NTP traffic across the board. Word needs to
> go out for providers to
> slow down with the heavy hand of outright port blocking (if that is what's
> really going on). I'm just using
> my own encounters as a window on what might be a larger issue underway.
> 
> -Alby

I'd concur with your analysis here; The primary problem is that providers have 
knee-jerk responses that are contingent on existing port-based filtering that 
seems so commonplace.

What needs to happen is there needs to be direct pressure for anyone and 
everyone who operates a network — regardless if it's a small office network or 
multi-national network provider to implement BCP38[1]. At this point providers 
are comfortable with blocking ports because with the likes of NETBIOS 138/445, 
SMTP 25 it allegedly made sense rather than working against the cause of the 
problems and the providers that aid and abet the abuse. Now NTP 123 is joining 
those port blocking ranks.

The root of the problem is that operators on the Internet no longer really 
want to "rock the boat" and name names of providers who permit abusive traffic, 
and to implement operational policies that manage the risk of communicating 
with those providers. Why these "don't rock the boat" policies are in play is 
anyone's guess and is outside of the scope of this list but suffice it to say 
until BCP38 is implemented on most networks, the problematic networks won't 
feel the pressure to bring these UDP abuses under control. 

Without BCP38, it will only be a matter of time before another UDP-transported 
protocol is abused for amplification DNS... NTP... what next?..

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp38 and
        http://www.bcp38.info/index.php/Main_Page

-- 
Kradorex Xeron <[email protected]>
Founder, Executive Director
Digibase Operations, Research and Development

_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to