On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 23:01:41 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Freitag, Juni 21, 2019 16:12 CEST, kpcyrd <kpc...@rxv.cc> schrieb:
> 
> > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:45:45AM +0000, kpcyrd wrote:
> > > Thanks for pointing this out, I've looked into this bug and released a
> > > bugfix release, the updated port is attached to this email.
> > >
> > > The in-depth analysis of this bug is that I've been using
> > > std::env::current_exe() which has a special catch on openbsd if the
> > > binary location has been resolved with $PATH instead of a relative or
> > > absolute path. In that specific case it fails to spawn a child process
> > > that is used as a sandbox to run the script.
> > >
> > > This has been resolved in 0.11.2.
> >
> > Anything else I can do to move this forward?
> 
> the other day I was looking for something that queries certificate 
> transparency
> logs, and sn0int just does that, and works well for me ;)
> Was just following along the quickstart from the sn0int dcoumentation PDF.
> So I followed it loosely along, and seems to work for me.
> 
> Ports wise, should change:
> PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM => PERMIT_PACKAGE
> 
> similarily to gonzalo@, I'm not a RUST expert, and when I see all these
> cargo stuff, I wonder a bit about maintainability.

Yes, that is a lot stuff.

> 
> So generally, besides the little PERMIT_PACKAGE, it looks OK to me,
> any objections to import?
> 
> cheers,
> Sebastian
> 
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> 

Whoops, sorry about this, sure OK to me, we can take care of it xD.

-- 

                - gonzalo

Reply via email to