On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 23:01:41 +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, Juni 21, 2019 16:12 CEST, kpcyrd <kpc...@rxv.cc> schrieb: > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:45:45AM +0000, kpcyrd wrote: > > > Thanks for pointing this out, I've looked into this bug and released a > > > bugfix release, the updated port is attached to this email. > > > > > > The in-depth analysis of this bug is that I've been using > > > std::env::current_exe() which has a special catch on openbsd if the > > > binary location has been resolved with $PATH instead of a relative or > > > absolute path. In that specific case it fails to spawn a child process > > > that is used as a sandbox to run the script. > > > > > > This has been resolved in 0.11.2. > > > > Anything else I can do to move this forward? > > the other day I was looking for something that queries certificate > transparency > logs, and sn0int just does that, and works well for me ;) > Was just following along the quickstart from the sn0int dcoumentation PDF. > So I followed it loosely along, and seems to work for me. > > Ports wise, should change: > PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM => PERMIT_PACKAGE > > similarily to gonzalo@, I'm not a RUST expert, and when I see all these > cargo stuff, I wonder a bit about maintainability.
Yes, that is a lot stuff. > > So generally, besides the little PERMIT_PACKAGE, it looks OK to me, > any objections to import? > > cheers, > Sebastian > > > > > Thanks! > > > Whoops, sorry about this, sure OK to me, we can take care of it xD. -- - gonzalo