On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Willy De la Court wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 11:24:17 +0100, Clunk Werclick
<clunk.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk> wrote:
[snip]
reject_rbl_client no-more-funn.moensted.dk
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
reject_rbl_client dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
reject_rbl_client dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
reject_rbl_client dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcannibal.org
reject_rbl_client spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org
permit
[SNIP]
wow a lot of rbls. I used to use some of these but got a lot of complaints
so i'm sticking with just spamcop and spamhaus.
I'm still figuring things out, and have not really went very deep into
spam prevention at this point. My question about the rbl rejects at the
smtp level is whether it's possible to only apply this to certain
domains/accounts without resorting ot using a policy daemon. I'm guessing
no, but that may just be my old qmail pessimism. :)
Thanks,
Charles
...
Have much fun and remember some spam is nice. Especially in a baguette
with some 'daddies' sauce
Yep very nice.
--
Simple things make people happy.
Willy De la Court
PGP Public Key at http://www.linux-lovers.be/download/public_key.asc
PGP Key fingerprint = 784E E18F 7F85 9C7C AC1A D5FB FE08 686C 37C7 A689
GMail <wdl1...@gmail.com>
