On 2010-11-10 2:52 AM, Rich wrote: > The only difference I would have on this server is I would make it a > 10 raid and not raid5. This is a much more higher performing with all > the writes to maildir. Its also better fault tolerance.
I fail to see any reference to RAID5 in the text you quoted... please quote only *relevant* text and trim unnecessary verbage. I do recall Stan (I think it was Stan) recommending RAID5 and I was going to ask why RAID 5 over RAID10... Ive been using EAID 10 with great success for many years... -- Best regards, Charles
