Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> Wieste, will postfix be moving to the CPL, or will it be retaining the > >> IPL? > > > > The IPL is the second license under which Postfix was released. > > With IPL and CPL being similar in spirit (and equally objectionable > > for OpenBSD, according to people I talked to) I need to hear good > > arguments before I would enter further discussion with IBM lawyers. > > Hi Wieste,
Please, spell my name correctly. Thank you. > I see that the CPL has in fact been replaced with the EPL. Do the BSD > folks find it as objectionable as well? If not, then if you do look into > re-licensing postfix, perhaps the EPL would be a better solution. I don't run to the IP laywers for each iteration of the IBM license agreement, nor do I run to the OpenBSD people to ask for their opinion. I would need to hear really good reasons before I change this position. I don't care if one flavor of "you must release source code" is better than another flavor. If I had the choice it then would be the same BSD licence that I slapped on my older tools. Wietse