Deeztek.com Support: > On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote: > > > > > >[email protected] smtp:[1.1.1.1] > > > >[email protected] smtp:[2.2.2.2] > > > >example.com smtp:somewhere.else > > > > > > Sorry about the top-posting. Okay this is a little bit closer. So, > > > I'm assuming if I use the domain in conjuction with recipients for > > > the same domain the transport line for the domain has to point > > > somewhere completely different than the recipient lines? In other > > > words I can't have the following? > > > > > > [email protected] smtp:[1.1.1.1] > > > [email protected] smtp:[2.2.2.2] > > > example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1] > > > > You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox > > transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport > > entries only, and handle per-user routing via virtual(5) alias rewriting.
Typically this would be done with virtual aliases that send [email protected] to [email protected] Wietse
