Re: header_checks issue

[Deeztek.com Support]

On 2/22/2013 4:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:

Deeztek.com Support:

On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote:

b...@example.com   smtp:[1.1.1.1]
m...@example.com  smtp:[2.2.2.2]
example.com       smtp:somewhere.else

Sorry about the top-posting. Okay this is a little bit closer. So,
I'm assuming if I use the domain in conjuction with recipients for
the same domain the transport line for the domain has to point
somewhere completely different than the recipient lines? In other
words I can't have the following?

b...@example.com   smtp:[1.1.1.1]
m...@example.com  smtp:[2.2.2.2]
example.com       smtp:[1.1.1.1]

You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox
transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport
entries only, and handle per-user routing via virtual(5) alias rewriting.

Typically this would be done with virtual aliases that send
b...@example.com to  b...@server-for-bob.example.com

        Wietse

I cannot seem to find any reference to the format you have suggested above for the aliases file. I tried it as

Thanks


--

b...@exaple.com to b...@1.1.1.1-for-bob.example.com with no luck. Any suggestions?

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature