micah anderson:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> writes:
>
> > welcome to the internet. Can be misconfigured client, spamware somewhere,
> > scan, whatever. Firewalling those automatically is the only way to limit
> > those messages.
>
> I'm curious what kind of firewalling rules that people have come
> up with to limit these. Are you just doing a fail2ban type reaction,
> or have some particular state you are denying? I'd be happy to see
> some iptables or even pf examples.
Why bother? Storage is cheap, and repeated logging compresses
very well. So it is only a proble, if you keep uncompressed logs
forever.
Wietse
